IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v9y2016i1d10.1007_s40271-015-0154-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy

Author

Listed:
  • Hind T. Hatoum

    (Hind T. Hatoum & Company
    University of Illinois at Chicago)

  • Swu-Jane Lin

    (University of Illinois at Chicago)

  • Raymond E. Joseph

    (Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.)

  • David N. Dahdal

    (Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.)

Abstract

Background Colonoscopy is the most widely used test to screen for colorectal cancer but its use may be hindered by patients’ inability to complete the bowel preparation. Patient-reported satisfaction with bowel-cleansing preparations has received little attention. We assessed the reliability and validity of a patient satisfaction survey used in two large, multicenter, randomized, assessor-blinded colonoscopy trials. Methods Datasets from two pivotal trials were combined. Patients in both trials included men and women aged 18–80 years who were scheduled for an elective outpatient colonoscopy. Questions relevant to satisfaction with bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy were identified from the literature and incorporated into a 7-item survey administered to patients on the day of colonoscopy. Domain 1 of the satisfaction measure assessed difficulty using bowel-cleansing preparations, ability to consume preparations, acceptability of taste, and overall experience; questions regarding acceptance or refusal of future use of the same bowel preparation were asked in Domain 2. Responses from each item of Domain 1 were transformed on a scale ranging from 0 to 100 and summed as total satisfaction scores. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure reliability; validity was assessed by evaluating relationship between total satisfaction (Domain 1) and willingness to use preparation in the future (Domain 2). Results Mean age of the 1211 trial participants was 56: 61 % female, 89.5 % Caucasian. Domain 1 had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.79, with higher satisfaction predicting higher future acceptability (p

Suggested Citation

  • Hind T. Hatoum & Swu-Jane Lin & Raymond E. Joseph & David N. Dahdal, 2016. "Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 9(1), pages 27-34, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:9:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-015-0154-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0154-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-015-0154-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-015-0154-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:9:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-015-0154-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.