IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v2y2009i3p151-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of, Satisfaction with, and Willingness to Switch Prescription and Over-The-Counter Treatments for Chronic Urticaria

Author

Listed:
  • Donald Stull
  • Sonia Gavriel

Abstract

Background: Chronic urticaria (hives) affects a sizeable number of people worldwide, perhaps as much as 3%. It is often accompanied by angioedema. The negative effects of urticaria and angioedema, and any adverse effects of treatment, can result in significant patient burden. Objective: To explore patients’ use of, preferences for, and willingness to switch from prescription to over-the-counter (OTC) treatments for chronic urticaria. In addition, we compared treatment satisfaction with the treatment used most recently for their chronic urticaria. Methods: Data were collected by an online survey using members of international consumer survey panels representative of the general populations in France and Germany. Panelists with urticaria were selected based on answers to screening questions. Respondents were asked, in their native language, questions about their typical course of treatment (prescription vs OTC), satisfaction with treatment, troublesomeness of their typical outbreak, whether their condition had improved or become worse over the past 12 months, and their willingness to try a new treatment if one became available. Descriptive analyses were performed on selected variables. Groups were compared using difference of means tests. Correlations and multiple regressions were performed to assess predictors of satisfaction with treatment and likelihood of switching treatment. Results: The final study sample consisted of 405 patients. Patients who used prescription treatments were more satisfied and reported greater treatment benefits with their treatment than those using OTC treatments. Patients who felt that their condition had become worse over the past 12 months were more likely to consider switching treatments. Respondents who used Aerius® (desloratadine) most recently for treating their symptoms reported greater satisfaction with treatment than did those who used other commonly used prescription treatments most recently. Conclusions: These results suggest that prescription treatments for chronic urticaria have a valuable place amongst the treatments offered for this very uncomfortable condition. Moreover, patients expressed preference for prescription treatments in large part because they felt that these treatments work. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Donald Stull & Sonia Gavriel, 2009. "Use of, Satisfaction with, and Willingness to Switch Prescription and Over-The-Counter Treatments for Chronic Urticaria," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 2(3), pages 151-157, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:2:y:2009:i:3:p:151-157
    DOI: 10.2165/11314870-000000000-00000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/11314870-000000000-00000
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/11314870-000000000-00000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:2:y:2009:i:3:p:151-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.