IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v18y2025i6d10.1007_s40271-025-00757-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient and Caregiver Experiences of CAR T Cell Therapy for Blood Cancer in the UK: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Christel McMullan

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham)

  • Melanie J. Calvert

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham)

  • Sarah E. Hughes

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham)

  • Lester Pyatt

    (University of Birmingham)

  • Bernie Kern

    (University of Birmingham)

  • Karen L. Shaw

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham)

  • Biruk Asfaw

    (University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Caroline Besley

    (University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Niamh Buckingham

    (Anthony Nolan)

  • Hayley Ellis

    (University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Caitlin Farrow

    (Anthony Nolan)

  • Maria Mazza

    (University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Rachel Miller

    (Anthony Nolan)

  • David Irvine

    (Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde)

  • Ceri Jones

    (Cardiff and Vale University Health Board)

  • Emily John

    (Anthony Nolan
    Cardiff and Vale University Health Board)

  • Yasmin Sheikh

    (Anthony Nolan)

  • Gemma Pugh

    (Anthony Nolan)

  • Christina Yiallouridou

    (Anthony Nolan)

  • Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham)

Abstract

Background Advanced cell therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T cell) therapies, offer novel opportunities for the treatment of advanced blood cancers such as lymphoma and leukaemia. However, as these therapies are relatively new, there is limited information on the experiences of patients and informal caregivers of the treatment which may influence the uptake of these therapies. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore their experiences to facilitate the identification of specific issues that should be addressed to positively impact patient outcomes and experiences of care. Methods We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 26 CAR T cell recipients from four UK CAR T cell centres who were ≥ 1 month post-treatment and nine caregivers. Interviews explored participants’ experiences of CAR T cell therapy and perspectives on key issues. Data from the interviews were inductively coded using thematic analysis. Results The main themes identified included (1) opinions of information provision, (2) experiences of protective isolation, (3) impacts of illness and treatment, (4) reflections on support needed and received, and (5) role of charities and support groups. Participants highlighted the need for support specifically for caregivers and provided practical suggestions for improving the experiences of future patients. Conclusions Interventions to address the issues raised need to be co-developed with key stakeholders, including patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals, policymakers and charitable organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Christel McMullan & Melanie J. Calvert & Sarah E. Hughes & Lester Pyatt & Bernie Kern & Karen L. Shaw & Biruk Asfaw & Caroline Besley & Niamh Buckingham & Hayley Ellis & Caitlin Farrow & Maria Mazza &, 2025. "Patient and Caregiver Experiences of CAR T Cell Therapy for Blood Cancer in the UK: A Qualitative Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(6), pages 729-745, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00757-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00757-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-025-00757-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-025-00757-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00757-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.