IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v18y2025i6d10.1007_s40271-025-00752-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Interviews: Recommendations for Best Practices in Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Measure Development and Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Keith A. Meadows

    (Health Outcomes Insights Ltd
    Health Outcomes Insights Ltd)

  • Nur Ferrante

    (Art of Diversity)

  • Tomislav Geršić

    (University of Rijeka)

Abstract

Cognitive interviewing is a technique that can be used to improve and refine questionnaire items. Cognitive interviewing is now a commonly used method to improve the reliability and validity of clinical outcome assessment instruments by identifying problems respondents have in understanding and answering the draft questionnaire items, and then to revise the items to improve understanding and response accuracy. Although practitioners are in general agreement regarding the basic principles and aims of the cognitive interview, there is considerable variation in practitioners’ approaches. The aim of this paper is to put forward a few recommendations regarding best practice in the application of cognitive interviews as part of the developmental process of clinical outcome assessment instruments. The paper is structured in order that each section addresses a discrete and key element of the cognitive interview process that ranges from selecting the appropriate methodology, development of the interview guide, interviewer recruitment and training, and determining sample size through to approaches for analysis and writing the cognitive interview report. Each element of the cognitive interview process is divided into (1) the rational underpinning the methodology; (2) the recommended procedural steps; and (3) an overview of lessons learnt from previous research.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith A. Meadows & Nur Ferrante & Tomislav Geršić, 2025. "Cognitive Interviews: Recommendations for Best Practices in Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Measure Development and Validation," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(6), pages 609-621, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00752-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00752-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-025-00752-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-025-00752-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00752-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.