IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v18y2025i6d10.1007_s40271-025-00751-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Tools for the Efficient Design of Health Preference Studies: Taxonomy of Attributes and Prototype of an Attribute Library

Author

Listed:
  • Norah L. Crossnohere

    (The Ohio State University College of Medicine)

  • Jonah Golder

    (Medical Device Innovation Consortium)

  • Esther W. Bekker-Grob

    (Erasmus University)

  • Juan Marcos Gonzalez Sepulveda

    (Duke University)

  • Kert Gunasekaran

    (Medical Device Innovation Consortium)

  • Alissa Hanna

    (Edwards Lifesciences)

  • Bennett Levitan

    (Johnson and Johnson)

  • Barry Liden

    (University of Southern California)

  • Deborah Marshall

    (University of Calgary)

  • Christine Poulos

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Shelby D. Reed

    (Duke University)

  • Ellen M. Janssen

    (Johnson and Johnson)

Abstract

Preference information describes the relative desirability or acceptability of specified alternatives that differ across health states, interventions, or services. Studies that generate preference information are being designed to support patient-centered decision making across all stages of the medical product lifecycle, as well as in healthcare more generally. Ensuring high-quality preference research with the potential for impact requires transparent and thoughtful study design, a core aspect of which often includes the development of attributes. Good practices for attribute development in preference studies have started to emerge and demonstrate that developing attributes requires substantial time and effort. Resources to more easily and systematically identify potentially relevant attributes may support the accessibility, interoperability, and reusability of attributes, in turn improving the efficiency of preference study design and comparability of findings across studies. In this paper, we first describe the need for and potential benefit of tools that promote the purposeful re-use of attributes for preference studies. We next present a taxonomy for categorizing and describing attributes that could be applied to facilitate their identification. Finally, we apply this taxonomy to a prototype “attribute library,” developed as a part of a Medical Device Innovation Consortium work group, to demonstrate the potential value of these resources to support the preference research community.

Suggested Citation

  • Norah L. Crossnohere & Jonah Golder & Esther W. Bekker-Grob & Juan Marcos Gonzalez Sepulveda & Kert Gunasekaran & Alissa Hanna & Bennett Levitan & Barry Liden & Deborah Marshall & Christine Poulos & S, 2025. "Developing Tools for the Efficient Design of Health Preference Studies: Taxonomy of Attributes and Prototype of an Attribute Library," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(6), pages 585-596, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00751-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00751-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-025-00751-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-025-00751-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00751-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.