Author
Listed:
- Debbie Braybrook
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation)
- Lucy Coombes
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust)
- Hannah M. Scott
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation)
- Daney Harðardóttir
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation)
- Anna Roach
(Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health)
- Jemimah Bariuan
(King’s College London, GKT School of Medical Education)
- Clare Ellis-Smith
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation)
- Julia Downing
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation
Kwazulu Natal)
- Fliss E. M. Murtagh
(University of Hull)
- Myra Bluebond-Langner
(University College London
Rutgers University)
- Lorna K. Fraser
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation)
- Richard Harding
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation)
- Katherine Bristowe
(Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation)
Abstract
Background Globally, over 21 million children need palliative care each year. Although guidelines exist to support paediatric palliative care delivery, they are not informed by the experiences of children themselves. Objective We aimed to determine what constitutes good quality palliative care from the perspectives of children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions and their parents. Methods We analysed semi-structured qualitative interviews using reflexive thematic analysis informed by the European Association for Palliative Care charter of palliative care for children and young people, and Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model. Participants included 26 children aged 5–17 years, and 40 parents of children aged 0–17 years, with a range of cancer and non-cancer diagnoses in nine UK paediatric palliative care services (hospitals and hospices). Results Quality paediatric palliative care can be both enacted or interrupted across the five domains of the bioecological model. Honest timely communication with the child and family (microsystem), and collaborative relationships between care teams and others in the child’s life (mesosystem), are vital. Care experiences are negatively affected by inequities in care provision (exosystems), and society’s reluctance to discuss mortality in childhood (macrosystem). Children need to enjoy what matters to them, and maintain social connections, and plan for the future, even if facing a shortened life (chronosystem). Conclusions Children and parents are experts in their condition and should be actively involved in care discussions, through communication tailored to the child’s pace and preferences, and support advocating for and coordinating care services. Fostering strong and collaborative relationships builds trust and helps children and families to feel safe, included and supported.
Suggested Citation
Debbie Braybrook & Lucy Coombes & Hannah M. Scott & Daney Harðardóttir & Anna Roach & Jemimah Bariuan & Clare Ellis-Smith & Julia Downing & Fliss E. M. Murtagh & Myra Bluebond-Langner & Lorna K. Frase, 2025.
"What Constitutes High-Quality Paediatric Palliative Care? A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives of Children, Young People, and Parents,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(5), pages 539-561, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00744-8
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00744-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00744-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.