Author
Listed:
- Jennifer A. Whitty
(Evidera
The University of East Anglia)
- Emily Lancsar
(Australian National University)
- Richard Abreu Lourenco
(University of Technology Sydney)
- Kirsten Howard
(University of Sydney)
- Elly A. Stolk
(Erasmus University Rotterdam
EuroQol Research Foundation)
Abstract
Choice-based preference elicitation methods such as the discrete choice experiment (DCE) present hypothetical choices to respondents, with an expectation that these hypothetical choices accurately reflect a ‘real world’ health-related decision context and that consequently the choice data can be held to be a true representation of the respondent’s health or treatment preferences. For this to be the case, careful consideration needs to be given to the format of the choice task in a choice experiment. The overarching aim of this paper is to highlight important aspects to consider when designing and ‘setting up’ the choice tasks to be presented to respondents in a DCE. This includes the importance of considering the potential impact of format (e.g. choice context, choice set presentation and size) as well as choice set content (e.g. labelled and unlabelled choice sets and inclusion of reference alternatives) and choice questions (stated choice versus additional questions designed to explore complete preference orders) on the preference estimates that are elicited from studies. We endeavoure to instil a holistic approach to choice task design that considers format alongside content, experimental design and analysis.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer A. Whitty & Emily Lancsar & Richard Abreu Lourenco & Kirsten Howard & Elly A. Stolk, 2025.
"Putting the Choice in Choice Tasks: Incorporating Preference Elicitation Tasks in Health Preference Research,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(5), pages 415-423, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00696-5
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00696-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-024-00696-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.