IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v18y2025i4d10.1007_s40271-025-00738-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elderly People’s Preferences for Different Organizational Models for Frailty Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Lucile Mulot

    (Tours University Medical Center
    LIRAES, University of Paris Cité)

  • Fanny Monmousseau

    (Tours University Medical Center
    University of Tours)

  • Sophie Dubnitskiy-Robin

    (Tours University Medical Center)

  • Maurine Diot

    (Tours University Medical Center)

  • Pierre Marionnaud

    (Tours University Medical Center)

  • Solène Brunet-Houdard

    (Tours University Medical Center
    University of Tours)

  • Bertrand Fougere

    (University of Tours
    Tours University Medical Center)

Abstract

Objectives Frailty dimensions can be evaluated in a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). As frailty is often reversible, early detection can help to maintain a person’s independence. The objective of the present study was to identify organizational factors that would encourage people aged 60 years or over to agree to frailty screening. Methods A face-to-face discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit older adults’ preferences for five attributes of the CGA: the initiator, pre-assessment, location, schedules, and announcement of the results. To assess the relative importance of attributes and explore relationships between preferences and participant characteristics, the data were analyzed using conditional logit, mixed logit, and bivariate probit models. Results A total of 224 people (women: 61.2%; mean age: 72.2 years; urban dwellers: 61.6%; caregivers for other people: 35.6%) completed the survey. The CGA initiator, schedules, and location significantly influenced the respondents’ preferences. The organizational preferences varied according to the respondent’s quality of life and relationship with the family physician, as well as knowledge of the CGA; while agreement to attend a CGA depended on the person’s gender, living environment, socioprofessional category, and caregiver status. Ideally, the CGA should be initiated by the family physician, carried out at the family physician’s office or in hospital (but not at home), and split into two parts on the same day. The CGA results should preferably be presented by the healthcare professional who carried out the assessment. Conclusions Early frailty screening by a mobile geriatric team or specifically trained professionals in a neutral location close to the older person’s home might be envisaged.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucile Mulot & Fanny Monmousseau & Sophie Dubnitskiy-Robin & Maurine Diot & Pierre Marionnaud & Solène Brunet-Houdard & Bertrand Fougere, 2025. "Elderly People’s Preferences for Different Organizational Models for Frailty Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(4), pages 343-355, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00738-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:18:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-025-00738-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.