IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v17y2024i3d10.1007_s40271-023-00654-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of Life in Adults with Chronic Cough: A Mixed Methods Study Informing the Development of a Quantitative Patient Preference Study

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa Coles

    (Duke University School of Medicine)

  • Molly McFatrich

    (Duke University School of Medicine)

  • Helen Ding

    (Merck & Co., Inc.)

  • Nicole Lucas

    (Duke University School of Medicine)

  • Erin Daniell

    (Duke University School of Medicine)

  • Aparna Swaminathan

    (Duke Clinical Research Institute
    Duke University Medical Center)

  • Jonathan Schelfhout

    (Merck & Co., Inc.)

  • Reed Johnson

    (Duke University School of Medicine
    Duke Clinical Research Institute
    Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy)

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to describe quality of life for patients with chronic cough (CC) and identify meaningful attributes that affect patient treatment preferences to inform the design of a quantitative preference study. Methods Eligible patients (≥ 18 years) with a CC (> 8 weeks) participated in qualitative interviews with two defined steps. Step one: concept elicitation and bidding games were used to collect descriptions of patient experiences with CC and identify important CC-related attributes. Step two: attributes were confirmed using concept elicitation and bidding games and prioritized using structured card sort activities. Purposive sampling ensured diversity of patient experiences. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze participant narratives, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize card sort results. This study follows a fully mixed concurrent dominant status design, with qualitative (dominant) and quantitative components. Results A total of 20 participants were interviewed with a mean age of 61.4 years (range 24–79 years). Coughing episodes, described as intense consecutive coughs that made catching breath difficult, were important to most participants (n = 17). Participants emphasized the emotional impact of episodes including feelings of uncertainty, loss of control, self-consciousness, and fear. Severity of CC was most often judged by frequency (n = 11) and intensity (n = 12) of cough. Daily, physical, or social activities were impacted for most participants. Impact on sleep (n = 14) included waking during the night, difficulty falling asleep, and daytime fatigue. Medication-related taste disturbances were an important consideration for what participants were willing to accept in exchange for cough relief. Conclusions This study emphasizes the importance of coughing episodes for adults with CC and provides initial evidence that taste alterations are an important component of patient treatment decisions for CC.

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa Coles & Molly McFatrich & Helen Ding & Nicole Lucas & Erin Daniell & Aparna Swaminathan & Jonathan Schelfhout & Reed Johnson, 2024. "Quality of Life in Adults with Chronic Cough: A Mixed Methods Study Informing the Development of a Quantitative Patient Preference Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 17(3), pages 253-262, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:17:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-023-00654-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00654-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-023-00654-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-023-00654-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:17:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-023-00654-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.