IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v16y2023i6d10.1007_s40271-023-00644-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Exploration of Patient and Staff Experiences of the Receipt and Delivery of Specialist Weight Management Services in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Ross Watkins

    (University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus)

  • Dawn Swancutt

    (University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus
    University of Plymouth)

  • Mia Alexander

    (University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus)

  • Shokraneh Moghadam

    (University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus)

  • Steve Perry

    (Independent Consultant (Patient Adviser))

  • Sarah Dean

    (University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus)

  • Rod Sheaff

    (University of Plymouth)

  • Jonathan Pinkney

    (University of Plymouth)

  • Mark Tarrant

    (University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus)

  • Jenny Lloyd

    (University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus)

Abstract

Background Addressing the increasing prevalence of obesity is a global public health priority. Severe obesity (body mass index > 40) reduces life expectancy, due to its association with people developing complications (e.g. diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease), and greatly impairs quality of life. The National Health Service (NHS) in the UK provides specialist weight management services (SWMS) for people with severe obesity, but key uncertainties remain around patient access to and engagement with weight management services, as well as pathways beyond the service. Methods In this multiple methods study, using online forum data and semi-structured interviews, stakeholders’ experiences of delivering and receiving SWMS were explored. Using the web search engine Google with keywords and web address (URL) identifiers, relevant public online platforms were sourced with snowball sampling and search strings used to identify threads related to people’s experiences of accessing SWMS (n = 57). Interviews were conducted with 24 participants (nine patients, 15 staff), and data from all sources were analysed thematically using the framework approach. Results Six themes related to access to and engagement with SWMS emerged during data analysis: (1) making the first move, (2) uncertainty and confusion, (3) resource issues, (4) respect and understanding, (5) mode of delivery, and (6) desire for ongoing support. Conclusion There is a mixed and varied picture of SWMS provision across the UK. The service offered is based on local clinical decision making and available resources, resulting in a range of patient experiences and perspectives. Whilst service capacity issues and patient anxiety were seen as barriers to accessing care, peer support and positive clinical and group interactions (connectedness between individuals) were considered to increase engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross Watkins & Dawn Swancutt & Mia Alexander & Shokraneh Moghadam & Steve Perry & Sarah Dean & Rod Sheaff & Jonathan Pinkney & Mark Tarrant & Jenny Lloyd, 2023. "A Qualitative Exploration of Patient and Staff Experiences of the Receipt and Delivery of Specialist Weight Management Services in the UK," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(6), pages 625-640, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-023-00644-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00644-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-023-00644-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-023-00644-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-023-00644-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.