IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v16y2023i3d10.1007_s40271-023-00616-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Outcome-Driven Care in Multiple Myeloma Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Qualitative Evaluation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Bennink

    (Erasmus University Medical Center
    Amphia)

  • Marleen Mul

    (Erasmus University)

  • Marjolein Klift

    (Amphia)

  • Annemiek Broijl

    (Erasmus University Medical Center)

  • Lidwine Tick

    (Maxima Medical Center)

  • Eva Jongh

    (Albert Schweitzer Hospital)

  • Mirjam Garvelink

    (St. Antonius Hospital)

  • Dorien Lobbezoo

    (Maastricht University Medical Center)

  • Pieter Sonneveld

    (Erasmus University Medical Center)

  • Jan Hazelzet

    (Erasmus University Medical Center)

Abstract

Background and Objective Multiple myeloma is an incurable disease with a considerable illness and treatment burden, which negatively impacts patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of multiple myeloma care in five Dutch hospitals, related to the three objectives of outcome-driven care, which are defined as (1) providing information for shared decision making in individual patient care, (2) supporting the learning capacity of healthcare professionals and healthcare institutions through benchmarking and (3) developing outcome-driven and patient-centred contracting by health insurers. Methods In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews about experiences with patient-reported outcomes were conducted with patients, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders 2 years after implementation. Data were thematically analysed, and emerging topics were clustered around the three objectives of outcome-driven care. Results A total of 46 interviews were held (15 with patients, 16 with professionals and 15 with other stakeholders) that showed patients with multiple myeloma were willing to complete patient-reported outcomes, although integration of patient-reported outcomes in shared decision making fell short in clinical practice. Aggregated patient-reported outcomes were considered important for improving quality of care; however, data collection and data exchange are hindered by privacy legislation, limitations of IT systems and a lack of data standards. Patient-reported outcomes were expected to contribute to cost-effective multiple myeloma treatment, yet outcome-driven reimbursement is still lacking. Conclusions Outcome-driven multiple myeloma care using patient-reported outcomes is feasible, provided that (1) patient-reported outcomes and shared decision making are integrated into clinical practice, (2) legal and technical obstacles hindering data collection are removed and (3) health insurers adjust their reimbursement plans to facilitate outcome-driven care.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Bennink & Marleen Mul & Marjolein Klift & Annemiek Broijl & Lidwine Tick & Eva Jongh & Mirjam Garvelink & Dorien Lobbezoo & Pieter Sonneveld & Jan Hazelzet, 2023. "Improving Outcome-Driven Care in Multiple Myeloma Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Qualitative Evaluation Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(3), pages 255-264, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-023-00616-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00616-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-023-00616-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-023-00616-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-023-00616-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.