IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v16y2023i1d10.1007_s40271-022-00597-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing Health State Descriptions for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: Stakeholder Engagement and Formative Qualitative Research

Author

Listed:
  • Erin G. Roth

    (University of Maryland School of Pharmacy)

  • Justin Kim

    (University of Maryland Baltimore)

  • Julia F. Slejko

    (University of Maryland School of Pharmacy)

  • C. Daniel Mullins

    (University of Maryland School of Pharmacy)

  • Jennifer L. Doyle

    (University of Maryland Thyroid Cancer Community Advisory Board)

  • David L. Levitt

    (University of Maryland Thyroid Cancer Community Advisory Board
    Maryland Endocrine)

  • Miguel Melendez

    (University of Maryland Thyroid Cancer Community Advisory Board)

  • Kyle J. Fletke

    (University of Maryland School of Medicine)

  • Yinin Hu

    (University of Maryland Baltimore)

Abstract

Overview This paper describes stakeholder involvement and formative qualitative research in the creation of health state descriptions (HSDs) or vignettes for low-risk thyroid cancer. The aim of this project was to engage stakeholders in the contribution of a novel set of HSDs, an important first step in the process of assessing value in thyroid cancer health states. Methods We draw upon formative, descriptive qualitative methods, following a multi-stage framework of data collection. We conducted individual semi-structured interviews, cognitive interviews, and focus groups with thyroid cancer patients, community providers, academic subspecialists, and participants with no thyroid cancer diagnosis (N = 31). The HSDs went through several iterations over the course of a year, in collaboration with a highly engaged community advisory board, laying the groundwork for HSDs that are comprehensible, comparable, and appropriate for stated-preference research. Findings Thyroid cancer survivors compared their experiences with those described in the HSDs. Feedback included concern for the emotional well-being of study participants who would be reading them. Providers were attuned to the need for clinical accuracy and made suggestions to reflect their clinical experience, including for patients with complications or disease progression. The pilot participants with no thyroid cancer were particularly valuable in promoting the need to simplify language and maximize readability. Discussion Stakeholder engagement was critical to being responsive to feedback as the iterations were refined and presented. Continuous engagement and consultation with multiple sources strengthened the HSDs. A secondary outcome from this project is that stakeholders expressed interest in adapting the HSDs into decision aids for people newly diagnosed with low-risk thyroid cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin G. Roth & Justin Kim & Julia F. Slejko & C. Daniel Mullins & Jennifer L. Doyle & David L. Levitt & Miguel Melendez & Kyle J. Fletke & Yinin Hu, 2023. "Constructing Health State Descriptions for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: Stakeholder Engagement and Formative Qualitative Research," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(1), pages 67-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00597-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00597-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-022-00597-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-022-00597-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00597-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.