IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v16y2023i1d10.1007_s40271-022-00596-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences for Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: Formative Qualitative Research Using the Patient Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Susan dosReis

    (University of Maryland Baltimore
    PAVE Center)

  • Laura M. Bozzi

    (University of Maryland Baltimore
    PAVE Center)

  • Beverly Butler

    (PAVE Center
    SWATS, LLC)

  • Richard Z. Xie

    (Innovation and Value Initiative)

  • Richard H. Chapman

    (Innovation and Value Initiative)

  • Jennifer Bright

    (Innovation and Value Initiative)

  • Erica Malik

    (Innovation and Value Initiative)

  • Julia F. Slejko

    (University of Maryland Baltimore
    PAVE Center)

Abstract

Objectives The goals of this formative research are to elicit attributes of treatment and desired outcomes that are important to individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD), to develop a stated preference instrument, and to pre-test the instrument. Methods A three-phase survey study design elicited the patient’s journey with MDD to design and pre-test the discrete choice experiment (DCE) instrument. Participants were 20 adults aged ≥ 18 with MDD who did not also have bipolar disorder or post-partum depression. We engaged patient advocates and a multi-disciplinary stakeholder advisory group to select and refine attributes for inclusion in a DCE instrument. The DCE was incorporated into a survey that also collected depression treatment and management and sociodemographic characteristics. The DCE was pre-tested with ten adults with MDD. Results Six attributes were included in the DCE: mode of treatment (medicine only, psychotherapy only, all modalities including brain stimulation), time to treatment effect (6, 9, 12 weeks), days of hopefulness (2, 4, 6 days/week), effect on productivity (40%, 60%, 90% increase), relations with others (strained, improved, no impact), and out-of-pocket costs ($30, $60, $90/month). The DCE test led to the refinement of mode of treatment (medicine, medicine and psychotherapy, and all modalities); time to treatment effect (4, 6, 9 weeks); monthly out-of-pocket costs ($30, $90, $270). Conclusions MDD treatment preferences revealed trade-offs among mode of treatment, time to treatment effect, functional outcomes, and cost. The findings demonstrate the potential for meaningfully incorporating the patient experience in preference measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan dosReis & Laura M. Bozzi & Beverly Butler & Richard Z. Xie & Richard H. Chapman & Jennifer Bright & Erica Malik & Julia F. Slejko, 2023. "Preferences for Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: Formative Qualitative Research Using the Patient Experience," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(1), pages 57-66, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00596-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00596-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-022-00596-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-022-00596-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00596-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.