IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v15y2022i5d10.1007_s40271-022-00577-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors That Patients Consider in Their Choice of Non-Surgical Management for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Formative Qualitative Research for a Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Bryanne L. Kennedy

    (University of Calgary)

  • Gillian R. Currie

    (University of Calgary
    University of Calgary
    University of Calgary
    University of Calgary)

  • Ania Kania-Richmond

    (University of Calgary
    Alberta Health Services)

  • Carolyn A. Emery

    (University of Calgary
    University of Calgary
    University of Calgary
    University of Calgary)

  • Gail MacKean

    (University of Calgary)

  • Deborah A. Marshall

    (University of Calgary
    University of Calgary
    University of Calgary
    University of Calgary)

Abstract

Background Approximately half of patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis have tried non-surgical management before surgical consultation. Understanding the many factors affecting the uptake of recommended strategies is important to inform future development of such management strategies. Objectives The aim of this study was to explore and identify factors that patients with osteoarthritis consider when choosing non-surgical management for hip and knee osteoarthritis, as formative research for a study of patient preferences for non-surgical management programs for osteoarthritis. Methods A qualitative research design was used. Participants were recruited using a combination of stratified and convenience sampling. Interviews were conducted, using a semi-structured interview guide, with English-speaking patients who had self-reported hip and/or knee osteoarthritis and at least one joint that had not undergone replacement surgery. Data were thematically analyzed. Results Thirteen patients participated in these interviews. Sixteen factors that participants considered when choosing non-surgical osteoarthritis management were identified. Eleven were extrinsic, relating to features of programs and services, and are categorized as types of interventions, general program and service details, and program-specific details. Five were intrinsic to the individual and influenced how decisions for osteoarthritis management were approached and the options available to choose from. Three novel factors included participants’ desire for further management, their views about joint replacement surgery, and whether they felt personal choice was available in osteoarthritis management strategies. Conclusion Key factors were identified that patients considered when making decisions about non-surgical management for their osteoarthritis that will be used to inform a discrete choice experiment (DCE) that aims to measure preferences for these factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryanne L. Kennedy & Gillian R. Currie & Ania Kania-Richmond & Carolyn A. Emery & Gail MacKean & Deborah A. Marshall, 2022. "Factors That Patients Consider in Their Choice of Non-Surgical Management for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Formative Qualitative Research for a Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 15(5), pages 537-550, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:15:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00577-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00577-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-022-00577-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-022-00577-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:15:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00577-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.