IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v14y2021i5d10.1007_s40271-021-00507-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should I Have Adjuvant Immunotherapy? An Interview Study Among Adults with Resected Stage 3 Melanoma and Their Partners

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Livingstone

    (The University of Sydney
    The University of Sydney)

  • Donna Milne

    (Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre)

  • Kathy Dempsey

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Danielle Marie Muscat

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Alexander M. Menzies

    (The University of Sydney
    Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals)

  • Kirsten Howard

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Martin R. Stockler

    (The University of Sydney
    The University of Sydney
    The University of Sydney)

  • Rachael L. Morton

    (The University of Sydney
    The University of Sydney)

Abstract

Background Adjuvant immunotherapy is a new treatment paradigm for adults with resected stage 3 melanoma. However, therapy can lead to long-term adverse health impacts, making immunotherapy decisions difficult. This study aimed to explore patients and their partners’ views when considering whether to commence adjuvant immunotherapy. Methods Focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted among adults with resected stage 3 melanoma and their partners between August 2019 and April 2020. Factors important to adjuvant immunotherapy decision making were explored. Recruitment continued until data saturation, with thematic analysis performed. Results Thirty-six participants were recruited across two cohorts, including 24 patients (mean age 65 years, 71% male), and 12 partners (mean age 69 years, 75% female). Twenty-two patients (92%) received adjuvant immunotherapy, two (8%) declined. Five patients (21%) ceased treatment early because of toxicity. Five themes about adjuvant immunotherapy were common to all participants: (1) life and death; (2) perceived risks and benefits; (3) seeking information; (4) healthcare team relationship; and (5) immunotherapy treatment considerations. Prolonging life was the primary consideration, with secondary concerns about treatment burden, timing, costs and efficacy. Conclusions This information can be used by clinicians to support melanoma treatment decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Livingstone & Donna Milne & Kathy Dempsey & Danielle Marie Muscat & Alexander M. Menzies & Kirsten Howard & Martin R. Stockler & Rachael L. Morton, 2021. "Should I Have Adjuvant Immunotherapy? An Interview Study Among Adults with Resected Stage 3 Melanoma and Their Partners," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(5), pages 635-647, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-021-00507-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00507-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-021-00507-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-021-00507-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-021-00507-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.