IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v14y2021i5d10.1007_s40271-020-00488-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Are the Preferences of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis for Treatment Modification? A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Suz Jack Chan

    (University of Otago)

  • Hui Yee Yeo

    (University of Otago)

  • Lisa K. Stamp

    (University of Otago)

  • Gareth J. Treharne

    (University of Otago)

  • Carlo A. Marra

    (University of Otago)

Abstract

Objectives Optimal care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients entails regular assessment of disease activity and appropriate adjustment of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) until a predefined treatment goal is achieved. This raises questions about the approach to treatment decision making among RA patients and their preference for associated treatment changes. We aimed to systematically identify and synthesize the available evidence of RA patients’ preferences regarding DMARD modification with an emphasis on escalating, tapering, stopping, or switching of DMARDs. Methods A scoping review was undertaken to gauge the breadth of evidence from the range of studies relating to RA patients’ preferences for DMARD modification. Pertinent databases were searched for relevant studies published between 1988 and 2019. Conventional content analysis was applied to generate themes about how patients perceive changes to their RA treatment. Results Of the 1730 distinct articles identified, 32 were included for review. Eight studies investigated RA patients’ perceptions of switching to other DMARDs, 18 studies reported RA patients’ preferences for escalating treatment, and six studies explored the possibility of tapering or stopping of biologic DMARDs. Four overarching themes relating to RA patients’ preferences for treatment modification were identified: (i) patient satisfaction, (ii) patients’ beliefs, (iii) information needs, and (iv) patient–clinician relationships. Conclusion Uptake of treatment changes in clinical practice can be improved by understanding how RA patients approach the decision to modify their treatment and how this relates to their satisfaction, beliefs, information needs, and relationships with clinicians. Future work is needed to systematically determine the significance of these factors in RA patients’ decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Suz Jack Chan & Hui Yee Yeo & Lisa K. Stamp & Gareth J. Treharne & Carlo A. Marra, 2021. "What Are the Preferences of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis for Treatment Modification? A Scoping Review," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(5), pages 505-532, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00488-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00488-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-020-00488-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-020-00488-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00488-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.