IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v14y2021i2d10.1007_s40271-020-00437-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Perspectives of Quality of the Same-Day Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation Process in Gauteng Province, South Africa: Qualitative Dominant Mixed-Methods Analysis of the SLATE II Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy A. Scott

    (Boston University School of Public Health)

  • Mhairi Maskew

    (University of the Witwatersrand)

  • Rachel M. Fong

    (Boston University School of Public Health)

  • Ingrid E. Olson

    (Boston University School of Public Health)

  • Alana T. Brennan

    (Boston University School of Public Health
    University of the Witwatersrand
    Boston University School of Public Health)

  • Matthew P. Fox

    (Boston University School of Public Health
    University of the Witwatersrand
    Boston University School of Public Health)

  • Lungisile Vezi

    (University of the Witwatersrand)

  • Peter D. Ehrenkranz

    (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation)

  • Sydney Rosen

    (Boston University School of Public Health
    University of the Witwatersrand)

Abstract

Background HIV patients in South Africa continue to report operational barriers to starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). In the Simplified Algorithm for Treatment Eligibility (SLATE) II trial, same-day initiation (SDI) of ART increased the number of patients commencing ART and achieving HIV viral suppression by using a screening tool to distinguish between patients eligible for SDI and those requiring additional care before starting treatment. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to explore trial patients’ perceptions and experiences of SDI. Methods SLATE II was implemented at three urban, public primary health care clinics in Gauteng Province, South Africa. We conducted a short quantitative survey and in-depth interviews among a purposive sample of 89 of the 593 trial participants in the intervention and standard arms, using a mixed inductive–deductive framework approach. Results Nearly all respondents (95%) were satisfied with their care, despite reporting clinic wait times of ≥ 3 h (72%). Intervention patients found the initiation process to be easy; standard patients found it complicated and were frustrated with being shuffled around the clinic. No intervention arm patients felt that SDI was “too fast” or indicated a preference for a more gradual process. Both groups highlighted the need for good counselling and non-judgmental, respectful staff. Standard patients suggested improving patient–provider relations, strengthening counselling, reducing wait times, and minimising referrals. Conclusions While it is difficult to untangle the role of providers from that of the SLATE algorithm in influencing patient experiences, adoption of SLATE II implementation procedures could improve patient experience of treatment initiation. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03315013, registered October 19, 2017.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy A. Scott & Mhairi Maskew & Rachel M. Fong & Ingrid E. Olson & Alana T. Brennan & Matthew P. Fox & Lungisile Vezi & Peter D. Ehrenkranz & Sydney Rosen, 2021. "Patient Perspectives of Quality of the Same-Day Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation Process in Gauteng Province, South Africa: Qualitative Dominant Mixed-Methods Analysis of the SLATE II Trial," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(2), pages 175-186, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00437-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00437-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-020-00437-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-020-00437-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00437-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.