IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v13y2020i6d10.1007_s40271-020-00447-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Mind Mapping in Family Meetings to Support Shared Decision Making with Pediatric and Geriatric Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew L. Russell

    (Massachusetts General Hospital)

  • Anne H. Carr

    (Hebrew Senior Life)

  • Kathleen Kieran

    (Seattle Children’s Hospital
    University of Washington)

Abstract

Introduction Divergent objectives and narratives among members of a healthcare team may lead to suffering, underscoring the need to align patient care with the patient’s self-identified priorities and goals. Shared decision making (SDM) with patients who may not be able to make healthcare decisions for themselves presents a unique challenge to healthcare providers, caregivers, and patients. Children and the elderly are two such groups where substituted decision making is often required. Family meetings, wherein stakeholders in a patient’s care are gathered, present opportunities to align expectations and clinical goals. There is a clear need for a technique exploring all facets of the patient’s story within the context of the biopsychosocial-spiritual model. We sought to promote narrative equity among stakeholders and maintain patient focus during family meetings. We describe the use of Mind Mapping in the family meeting to meet these objectives. Methods Using two clinical scenarios, one involving a geriatric patient and another involving a pediatric patient, we describe the stepwise development of Mind Maps and how their use informed discussions among stakeholders in the family meeting. Results Stakeholders found the Mind Maps easy to draw and helpful in eliciting their own priorities and preferences. Group exploration and refinement of the Mind Maps helped stakeholders to appreciate others’ sometimes divergent perspectives, to ensure that the patient’s voice was heard, and to ensure that care decisions were patient focused. Discussion Mind Mapping was easily performed in two clinical scenarios, allowing the patient, family, and medical team to explore the biopsychosocial-spiritual model extensively, to appreciate each stakeholder’s priorities, and to identify areas for further development. We have found that Mind Mapping helps define the ‘topography’ of relationships, prioritizes team discussions, finds shared interests in seemingly divergent objectives, and identifies which team member may best lead a discussion on a particular topic. Conclusion Mind Mapping may be a useful tool for family meetings, particularly for geriatric and pediatric patients with multiple stakeholders involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew L. Russell & Anne H. Carr & Kathleen Kieran, 2020. "Using Mind Mapping in Family Meetings to Support Shared Decision Making with Pediatric and Geriatric Patients," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(6), pages 709-717, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00447-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00447-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-020-00447-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-020-00447-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00447-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.