IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v13y2020i1d10.1007_s40271-019-00386-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COPD-Specific Self-Management Support Provided by Trained Educators in Everyday Practice is Associated with Improved Quality of Life, Health-Directed Behaviors, and Skill and Technique Acquisition: A Convergent Embedded Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Myriam Gagné

    (Université Laval
    Université Laval
    Québec Respiratory Health Education Network)

  • Sophie Lauzier

    (Université Laval
    Université Laval)

  • Justine Babineau-Therrien

    (Université Laval
    Université Laval)

  • Christine Hamel

    (Centre de recherche et intervention sur la réussite scolaire
    Université Laval)

  • Sara-Edith Penney

    (Québec Respiratory Health Education Network)

  • Jean Bourbeau

    (Québec Respiratory Health Education Network
    McGill University
    McGill University)

  • Jocelyne Moisan

    (Université Laval
    Université Laval)

  • Louis-Philippe Boulet

    (Université Laval
    Université Laval
    Québec Respiratory Health Education Network
    Université Laval)

Abstract

Background There is a necessity to better document the effect of continuing education activities targeted at respiratory educators providing self-management support for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We therefore sought to describe real-life COPD-specific self-management support delivered by respiratory educators who participated in a lecture-based continuing education activity and assess the outcomes of patients with COPD. Methods We conducted a convergent embedded mixed-methods study. Respiratory educators attended a 7-h, lecture-based continuing education activity on self-management support held in Québec, Canada. Four months after the continuing education activity, in their professional practice, trained educators provided self-management support to patients with COPD. One month later, to describe the components of self-management support provided, individual telephone interviews were conducted with educators. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and were qualitatively analyzed. Before self-management support and 6 months afterwards, we assessed the following clinical outcomes of patients with COPD: (1) quality of life (St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD patients, Impact domain; score 0–100; minimal clinically important difference = − 4; telephone administered); (2a) whether patients had one or more unscheduled doctor visit, (2b) one or more emergency room visit, and (2c) one or more hospitalization in the 6 preceding months (Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada; telephone administered); and (3a) health-directed behaviors and (3b) skill and technique acquisition (Health Education Impact Questionnaire; score 1–4; self-administered at home). We used mixed models to estimate mean differences and prevalence ratios, with associated 95% confidence intervals. Results Trained respiratory educators (nurse: n = 1; respiratory therapist: n = 3; ≥ 15 years of experience of care with patients with chronic disease) invited 75 patients with COPD to participate in the study. Fifty-four individuals with COPD (age, mean ± standard deviation: 68 ± 8 years; men: n = 31) were enrolled and received self-management support. Qualitative analyses revealed that self-management support consisted of one to two visits that included: (1) provision of information on COPD; (2) training in inhalation technique; and (3) smoking cessation advice. No educator reported implementing two or more follow-up visits because of a lack of time and human resources in their work setting. Among patients with COPD, improvements in quality of life were clinically important (adjusted mean difference = − 12.75; 95% confidence interval − 18.79 to − 6.71; p = 0.0001). Health-resource utilization was not different over time (all p values > 0.05). Improvements in health-directed behaviors and skill and technique acquisition were statistically significant (health-directed behaviors: adjusted mean difference = 0.50; 95% confidence interval 0.23–0.77; p = 0.0005; skill and technique acquisition: adjusted mean difference = 0.12; 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.23; p = 0.0293). Conclusions Following a 7-h, lecture-based continuing education activity on COPD-specific self-management support, respiratory educators with significant experience of care provided self-management support that included provision of information, inhalation technique training, and smoking cessation advice. This resulted in enhanced patient quality of life, health-directed behaviors, and skill and technique acquisition. To decrease health resource utilization, the training could employ active learning methods. More time and resources could also be devoted to implementing regular follow-up visits. Clinical Trials Registration No NCT02870998.

Suggested Citation

  • Myriam Gagné & Sophie Lauzier & Justine Babineau-Therrien & Christine Hamel & Sara-Edith Penney & Jean Bourbeau & Jocelyne Moisan & Louis-Philippe Boulet, 2020. "COPD-Specific Self-Management Support Provided by Trained Educators in Everyday Practice is Associated with Improved Quality of Life, Health-Directed Behaviors, and Skill and Technique Acquisition: A ," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(1), pages 103-119, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-019-00386-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00386-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-019-00386-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-019-00386-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-019-00386-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.