IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v12y2019i4d10.1007_s40271-019-00356-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient-Community Perspectives on Real-World Evidence: Enhancing Engagement, Understanding, and Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth M. Oehrlein

    (National Health Council)

  • Jennifer S. Graff

    (National Pharmaceutical Council)

  • Jason Harris

    (National Health Council)

  • Eleanor M. Perfetto

    (National Health Council
    University of Maryland School of Pharmacy)

Abstract

Background Healthcare stakeholders have pronounced both enthusiasm and apprehension over the expanding use of real-world evidence (RWE). The patient community—those who benefit from new treatments but are vulnerable to potential safety risks and whose routine medical encounters are used to generate RWE—has been less vocal. Understanding patient perspectives on the use of RWE to guide clinical decision making and inform regulatory decisions and value assessments is imperative. Methods We convened a day-long, multi-stakeholder roundtable in Washington D.C., USA, on 31 July 2017 to gather patient-community views on RWE and related concerns and the communications, information and tools needed by patients to understand, trust, and use RWE. Participants included a convenience sample of National Health Council (NHC) members primarily representing patient groups as well as non-patient members with an interest in RWE. Participants were organized into small, pre-assigned groups, ensuring representativeness across stakeholders and patient leadership. Discussions, including storyboards, notes, and illustrative examples were captured and later analyzed thematically by NHC staff. Results Ten RWE themes emerged: (1) most patients were unaware of RWE and its actual or potential uses, (2) common definitions for real-world data and RWE are needed, (3) patient organizations need RWE skills and tools, (4) patient–scientist partnerships can help differentiate high-quality RWE, (5) RWE should inform decision making, (6) clinician support is needed for RWE uptake in patient decision making, (7) communications to patients should be balanced and empowering, (8) context of use impacts RWE acceptability/trust, (9) privacy/data ownership require clarity, and (10) patient-generated data are also real-world data (RWD). Conclusion Patients see great possibility in using RWE to understand how a treatment works—to find someone that “looks like me” as assurance of how a treatment might benefit them personally. Patient groups will play a critical role in helping to educate constituents on understanding, contributing to, and using RWE. To maximize patient uptake and the co-development and application of RWE, patient groups require education and tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth M. Oehrlein & Jennifer S. Graff & Jason Harris & Eleanor M. Perfetto, 2019. "Patient-Community Perspectives on Real-World Evidence: Enhancing Engagement, Understanding, and Trust," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 12(4), pages 375-381, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:12:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-019-00356-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00356-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-019-00356-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-019-00356-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl V. Asche & Brian Seal & Kristijan H. Kahler & Elisabeth M. Oehrlein & Meredith Greer Baumgartner, 2017. "Evaluation of Healthcare Interventions and Big Data: Review of Associated Data Issues," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(8), pages 759-765, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabeth M. Oehrlein & Xuemei Luo & Mirko Savone & Trudie Lobban & Amiee Kang & Brian Lee & Rex Gale & Silke Schoch & Eleanor Perfetto, 2021. "Engaging Patients in Real-World Evidence: An Atrial Fibrillation Patient Advisory Board Case Example," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(2), pages 295-300, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelly Hosking & Geoffrey Stewart & Mikaela Mobsby & Steven Skov & Yuejen Zhao & Jiunn-Yih Su & Steven Tong & Peter Nihill & Joshua Davis & Christine Connors & Jane Davies, 2020. "Data linkage and computerised algorithmic coding to enhance individual clinical care for Aboriginal people living with chronic hepatitis B in the Northern Territory of Australia – Is it feasible?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:12:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-019-00356-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.