IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v12y2019i2d10.1007_s40271-018-0327-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treatment Decisions for Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Patient and Physician Perspectives on Maintenance Therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Suzanne McMullen

    (ICON Plc)

  • Lisa M. Hess

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Edward S. Kim

    (Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health)

  • Benjamin Levy

    (Mount Sinai Health Systems)

  • Mohamed Mohamed

    (Cone Health)

  • David Waterhouse

    (Oncology Hematology Care (OHC))

  • Antoinette Wozniak

    (Karmanos Cancer Institute)

  • Sarah Goring

    (ICON Plc)

  • Kerstin Müller

    (ICON Plc)

  • Catherine Muehlenbein

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Himani Aggarwal

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Yajun Zhu

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Ana B. Oton

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

  • Jennifer L. Ersek

    (Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health)

  • Katherine B. Winfree

    (Eli Lilly and Company)

Abstract

Introduction Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a severe disease with burdensome symptoms and traditionally poor outcomes. The treatment of advance disease is based on chemotherapy, with the recent addition of immunotherapy. Patients who respond to initial treatment can opt to receive maintenance therapy (MT). It is important to understand why patients with advanced NSCLC choose to accept or refuse therapy, and how physician recommendations play into this decision-making process. This study characterized patient and physician decision-making regarding treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC in the USA using the example of MT. Methods and Materials This study employed multiple approaches: patient interviews, a patient survey, and a physician survey. Qualitative interviews were conducted among patients who had been offered MT to identify factors influencing treatment decision-making. The patient survey explored the decision-making process and quantified challenges and motivators for receiving MT. The physician survey included a discrete choice experiment to understand the relationship between physician treatment recommendations and patient characteristics. Results Interviewed patients (n = 10) were motivated to receive MT in the hope of extending their lives and being proactive against their cancer, and they anticipated reduced adverse effects compared with first-line therapy. Surveyed patients (n = 77) described several deterrents to receiving therapy; the most prominent was severity of adverse effects, which was an influencing factor for 34% of patients. The major motivator for receiving therapy was the potential to extend life, which influenced 97% of patients. A total of 100 oncologists participated in the physician survey. Patients’ lack of treatment motivation/inconvenience, disease progression, presence of severe renal co-morbidities, and older age decreased the likelihood of physicians recommending the use of MT. Conclusion This study identified challenges and motivators influencing advanced NSCLC patients’ decisions to accept or refuse therapy, as well as patient and disease characteristics associated with physician’s treatment recommendations for MT.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzanne McMullen & Lisa M. Hess & Edward S. Kim & Benjamin Levy & Mohamed Mohamed & David Waterhouse & Antoinette Wozniak & Sarah Goring & Kerstin Müller & Catherine Muehlenbein & Himani Aggarwal & Ya, 2019. "Treatment Decisions for Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Patient and Physician Perspectives on Maintenance Therapy," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 12(2), pages 223-233, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:12:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-018-0327-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-018-0327-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-018-0327-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-018-0327-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:12:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-018-0327-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.