IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v11y2018i4d10.1007_s40271-017-0289-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stigma Perceived and Experienced by Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Linguistic Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Danish Version of the Type 1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-1 DK)

Author

Listed:
  • Ulla Møller Hansen

    (Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Diabetes Management Research
    Univeristy of Southern Denmark)

  • Ingrid Willaing

    (Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Diabetes Management Research)

  • Adriana D. Ventura

    (Deakin University
    The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes)

  • Kasper Olesen

    (Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Diabetes Management Research)

  • Jane Speight

    (Deakin University
    The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes
    AHP Research)

  • Jessica L. Browne

    (Deakin University
    The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes)

Abstract

Objectives We aimed to (a) culturally and linguistically adapt the Type 1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-1) from English (for Australia) into Danish and (b) examine psychometric properties of the measure among Danish adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods We performed a forward–backward translation, face validity interviews with experts and cognitive debriefing of the Danish version (DSAS-1 DK) with ten adults from the target group. The DSAS-1 DK was then completed by 1594 adults with type 1 diabetes. Electronic clinical records provided age, diabetes duration, diabetes-related complications, and glycemic control [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)]. We examined internal consistency, construct validity and structural validity of the DSAS-1 DK using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in a cross-validation design. Results The translated measure was found acceptable by the experts and target group, with only minor adaptations required for the Danish context. The DSAS-1 DK structure was best represented by a three-factor model representing the subscales ‘Treated Differently,’ ‘Blame and Judgement,’ and ‘Identity Concern’ (α = 0.88–0.89). The results also provided some support for calculation of a total score (19-item scale; α = 0.75). The subscales and total scale demonstrated satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity. Good structural validity was demonstrated for the three-factor model for four out of five indices [normed χ 2 = 4.257, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.923, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.065, standardized root mean square residual (SRMSR) = 0.0567, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.93]. Conclusion The DSAS-1 DK has a confirmed three-factor structure, consistent with the original Australian English version. The measure is now validated and available to advance research into the stigma perceived and experienced by adults with type 1 diabetes in a Danish context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulla Møller Hansen & Ingrid Willaing & Adriana D. Ventura & Kasper Olesen & Jane Speight & Jessica L. Browne, 2018. "Stigma Perceived and Experienced by Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Linguistic Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Danish Version of the Type 1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-1 DK)," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(4), pages 403-412, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0289-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0289-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0289-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0289-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0289-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.