IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v11y2018i2d10.1007_s40271-017-0279-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symptom Monitoring in Pediatric Oncology Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: Why, How, and Where Next

Author

Listed:
  • Allison Barz Leahy

    (Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
    Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia)

  • Chris Feudtner

    (Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
    The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania)

  • Ethan Basch

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Abstract

Symptom monitoring using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is not common in pediatric oncology, despite interest from stakeholders—including patients, families, clinicians, and regulatory organizations—and proven clinical benefit in adult oncology. This article examines the foundational data for patient-reported symptom reporting in this population and posits the next investigative steps toward the implementation of patient-reported symptom monitoring in the care and research of pediatric oncology patients. The reasoning behind, and feasibility of, monitoring symptoms in pediatric oncology patients using PRO measures are discussed, as well as specific tools that have been developed to track symptoms in this population, including innovative electronic self-reporting platforms built to engage children in the symptom reporting process. Aspects of engaging both patients and clinicians in the symptom self-report process are reviewed, as are the experiences of “early adopters” of this process in pediatric oncology and across pediatrics. It is clear that there are key issues that remain regarding the use of PROs for symptom monitoring, including selection of specific outcomes to monitor, how to resolve discrepant reports, and determination of benefit. The next steps for investigation of these issues are discussed. Unanswered questions notwithstanding, work should continue to make patient-reported symptom monitoring an established, evidence-based part of routine and research practice in pediatric oncology.

Suggested Citation

  • Allison Barz Leahy & Chris Feudtner & Ethan Basch, 2018. "Symptom Monitoring in Pediatric Oncology Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: Why, How, and Where Next," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(2), pages 147-153, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0279-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0279-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0279-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0279-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0279-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.