IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v11y2018i2d10.1007_s40271-017-0273-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis: The Journey to Diagnosis

Author

Listed:
  • Kristen L. McCausland

    (OptumInsight Life Sciences, Inc.)

  • Michelle K. White

    (OptumInsight Life Sciences, Inc.)

  • Spencer D. Guthrie

    (Prothena Biosciences Inc)

  • Tiffany Quock

    (Prothena Biosciences Inc)

  • Muriel Finkel

    (Amyloidosis Support Groups Inc)

  • Isabelle Lousada

    (Amyloidosis Research Consortium)

  • Martha S. Bayliss

    (OptumInsight Life Sciences, Inc.)

Abstract

Background Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare, complex disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Delays in diagnosis are common and may have detrimental consequences on patients’ prognosis. Too little is known regarding the patient journey to diagnosis. Objective The objective of this study was to describe the patient-reported journey to a correct diagnosis for AL amyloidosis. Methods Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from clinician (n = 4) and patient (n = 10) interviews and a survey of community-based patients with AL amyloidosis (n = 341). Data were used to document the patient experience between the onset of symptoms and the receipt of a diagnosis. Results Delays in diagnosis were common. Qualitative and quantitative data indicated that initial symptoms were varied and similar to other more prevalent diseases. Two themes regarding the journey to diagnosis emerged: (1) barriers to an early diagnosis; and (2) the emotional toll of the journey. Time to diagnosis was heavily influenced by how patients interpreted their initial symptoms, whether they sought early medical help, and challenges associated with making differential diagnoses. Survey results indicate that patients with primary cardiac involvement were more likely to receive a delayed diagnosis than those with primary kidney involvement. Patients described mixed emotions associated with the eventual diagnosis of AL amyloidosis. Conclusions These data support a need for better early identification and support for patients seeking a diagnosis. Increasing clinician awareness may reduce the time to diagnosis. Additional research is needed to identify optimal diagnostic testing to reduce delays in treatment initiation and subsequent severe impacts on health.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristen L. McCausland & Michelle K. White & Spencer D. Guthrie & Tiffany Quock & Muriel Finkel & Isabelle Lousada & Martha S. Bayliss, 2018. "Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis: The Journey to Diagnosis," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(2), pages 207-216, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0273-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0273-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0273-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0273-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0273-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.