IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v11y2018i1d10.1007_s40271-017-0287-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does EGFR Mutation Type Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer? Analysis of Two Large, Phase III Studies Comparing Afatinib with Chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6)

Author

Listed:
  • Yi-Long Wu

    (Guangdong General Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences)

  • Vera Hirsh

    (McGill University)

  • Lecia V. Sequist

    (Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School)

  • Cheng-Ping Hu

    (Central South University)

  • Jifeng Feng

    (Jiangsu Provincial Tumor Hospital)

  • Shun Lu

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

  • Yunchao Huang

    (Yunnan Tumor Hospital (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University))

  • Martin Schuler

    (University Duisburg-Essen)

  • Tony Mok

    (The Chinese University of Hong Kong)

  • Nobuyuki Yamamoto

    (Wakayama Medical University)

  • Kenneth O’Byrne

    (Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology)

  • Sarayut L. Geater

    (Prince of Songkla University)

  • Caicun Zhou

    (Tongji University)

  • Dan Massey

    (Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd UK)

  • Angela Märten

    (Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH)

  • Juliane Lungershausen

    (Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH)

  • James Chih-Hsin Yang

    (National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University)

Abstract

Introduction In LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (Del19/L858R) and significantly improved overall survival (OS) in patients with tumors harboring Del19 mutations. Patient-reported outcomes stratified by EGFR mutation type are reported. Patients and Methods Lung cancer symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL) were assessed every 21 days until progression using the EORTC Quality of Life Core Questionnaire C30 and its lung cancer-specific module, LC13. Analyses of cough, dyspnea, and pain were prespecified and included analysis of percentage of patients who improved on therapy, time to deterioration of symptoms, and change over time. Global health status (GHS)/QoL was also assessed. Analyses were conducted for all patients with tumors harboring Del19 or L858R mutations and were exploratory. Results Compared with chemotherapy, afatinib more commonly improved symptoms of, delayed time to deterioration for, and was associated with better mean scores over time for cough and dyspnea in patients with Del19 or L858R mutations. All three prespecified analyses of pain showed a trend favoring afatinib over chemotherapy. In both Del19 and L858R mutations, afatinib was also associated with improvements in GHS/QoL. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated statistically significant improvements in GHS/QoL for afatinib over chemotherapy for patients with tumors harboring Del19 mutations or L858R mutations. Conclusions These exploratory analyses suggest first-line afatinib improved lung cancer-related symptoms and GHS/QoL compared with chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with tumors harboring common EGFR mutations, with benefits in both Del19 and L858R patients. When considered with OS (Del19 patients only) and PFS benefits, these findings substantiate the value of using afatinib over chemotherapy in these patient groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi-Long Wu & Vera Hirsh & Lecia V. Sequist & Cheng-Ping Hu & Jifeng Feng & Shun Lu & Yunchao Huang & Martin Schuler & Tony Mok & Nobuyuki Yamamoto & Kenneth O’Byrne & Sarayut L. Geater & Caicun Zhou &, 2018. "Does EGFR Mutation Type Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer? Analysis of Two Large, Phase III Studies Comparing Afatinib wit," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(1), pages 131-141, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0287-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0287-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0287-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0287-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0287-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.