IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i5d10.1007_s40271-017-0229-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Experience of Symptoms and Side Effects when Treated with Osimertinib for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Interview Substudy

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Rydén

    (AstraZeneca Gothenburg)

  • Fiona Blackhall

    (University of Manchester
    The Christie NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Hye Ryun Kim

    (Yonsei University College of Medicine)

  • Rathi N. Pillai

    (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University)

  • Lauren Braam

    (Health Research Associates Inc.)

  • Mona L. Martin

    (Health Research Associates Inc.)

  • Andrew Walding

    (AstraZeneca R&D)

Abstract

Introduction Capturing the patient experience during treatment is important to both regulatory authorities and to patients starting treatment. We identified the symptoms and side effects experienced by patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer during osimertinib treatment, to understand treatment expectations, satisfaction, and the level of difficulty coping with the side effects experienced during treatment. Methods Qualitative interviews (approximately 4–6 weeks after treatment initiation and again after approximately 4 months of treatment) were conducted during the phase I/II AURA clinical trial of osimertinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor-sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. Results During the first interview (23 patients), the most commonly reported symptoms/side effects were coughing, itching, tiredness (each reported by 56.5% of patients), and rash (43.5%). During the second interview (21 patients), compared with the first interview, shortness of breath and diarrhea were reported by more patients (57.1 and 38.1%, respectively; both increased from 34.8%); tiredness remained predominant (42.9%); and itching (38.1%), coughing (38.1%), and rash (14.3%) were reported by fewer patients. At both interviews, the most frequently reported symptoms/side effects were also those most often rated by patients for bothersomeness and severity, and generally received mean scores in the low-to-moderate range. However, several rarely expressed symptoms/side effects (e.g., abdominal pain, frequent day time urination) received high bothersomeness ratings. At the second interview, patients were highly satisfied with osimertinib and had a low level of difficulty in coping with side effects during treatment. Conclusions These data enhance our understanding of patients’ experiences of symptoms/side effects, which could increase the accuracy of the osimertinib benefit–risk assessment, guide management of adverse events, and improve the information given to patients receiving the drug.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Rydén & Fiona Blackhall & Hye Ryun Kim & Rathi N. Pillai & Lauren Braam & Mona L. Martin & Andrew Walding, 2017. "Patient Experience of Symptoms and Side Effects when Treated with Osimertinib for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Interview Substudy," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(5), pages 593-603, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0229-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0229-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0229-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0229-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0229-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.