IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i5d10.1007_s40271-017-0228-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Validation of the Heart Failure Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ®)

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Strömberg

    (Linköping University
    Linköping University
    Linköping University
    University of California, Irvine)

  • Nicola Bonner

    (Adelphi Values)

  • Laura Grant

    (Adelphi Values)

  • Bryan Bennett

    (Adelphi Values)

  • Misook L. Chung

    (University of Kentucky)

  • Tiny Jaarsma

    (Linköping University)

  • Marie Louise Luttik

    (Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen)

  • Eldrin F. Lewis

    (Brigham and Women’s Hospital)

  • Frederico Calado

    (Novartis Pharma AG)

  • Celine Deschaseaux

    (Novartis Pharma AG)

Abstract

Background The Heart Failure Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ®) was developed to assess subjective outcomes of heart failure caregivers. The HF-CQ® comprises 21 questions on three domains, namely physical, emotional/psychological and lifestyle. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the HF-CQ®. Methods Patients (n = 150) with heart failure and their primary caregivers (n = 150) were recruited from 11 sites in USA. Caregivers completed the HF-CQ® and additional questionnaires, namely Caregiver Reaction Assessment, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, EuroQol-5 domain, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Patient-completed Global Impression of Severity, construct validity, concurrent validity, reliability and responsiveness of the HF-CQ® were also assessed. Results In the physical and lifestyle domains, all items showed acceptable validity. No high correlations between HF-CQ® scores and other caregiver-completed instruments, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, EuroQol-5 domain or Caregiver Reaction Assessment, were reported. The intra-class correlation coefficient exceeded the threshold for reliability (>0.7) across the physical well-being (0.785), emotional/psychological (0.797), lifestyle (0.787) and total scores (0.850), indicating acceptable reliability. Internal consistency results using Cronbach’s alpha showed the total aggregate score of 0.942 to be reliable. In the responsiveness analyses, each of the three scales and the total score showed responsiveness to changes defined by the Caregiver Global Impression of Severity. The overall caregiver burden score increased with increased severity of illness in the cared-for patients. Conclusions The study provides initial evidence for the acceptable validity of the HF-CQ® as an instrument to measure heart failure caregiver burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Strömberg & Nicola Bonner & Laura Grant & Bryan Bennett & Misook L. Chung & Tiny Jaarsma & Marie Louise Luttik & Eldrin F. Lewis & Frederico Calado & Celine Deschaseaux, 2017. "Psychometric Validation of the Heart Failure Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ®)," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(5), pages 579-592, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0228-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0228-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0228-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0228-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0228-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.