IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i4d10.1007_s40271-017-0226-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Speaking Up: How Patient and Physician Voices Shaped a Trial to Improve Goals-of-Care Discussions

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Solomon

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Cardinale Smith

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Jay Kallio
  • Amy Fenollosa
  • Barbara Benerofe
  • Laurence Jones
  • Kerin Adelson

    (Yale University School of Medicine, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven)

  • Jason P. Gonsky

    (SUNY Downstate Medical School)

  • Carolyn Messner

    (CancerCare)

  • Nina A. Bickell

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

Abstract

Background Patients with advanced cancer benefit from early goals-of-care (GoC) conversations, but few facilitators are known. Objective We describe the process and outcomes of involving patient and physician stakeholders in the design and development of a trial, funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), to enhance oncologists’ communication skills and their propensity to facilitate productive, meaningful GoC discussions with patients with advanced cancer. Methods We recruited oncologists, palliative care physicians, and patient stakeholders to participate in proposal development, intervention design and modification, identification of outcome measures, and refinement of study tools. Formats for exchange included 1:1 structured interviews, workshops, and stakeholder meetings. Results Patient and physician voices helped craft and implement a study of an intervention to enhance oncologists’ ability to facilitate GoC discussions with patients with advanced cancer. Physician inputs guided the creation of an oncologist and palliative care physician “joint visit” intervention at a turning point in disease management. Patient inputs impacted on the language used, outcome measures assessed, and approaches used to introduce patients to the intervention visit. Conclusions Stakeholder input informed the development of a novel intervention that physicians seemed to find both valuable and in sync with their needs and their practice schedules. Where communication about difficult subjects and shared decision making are involved, including multiple stakeholder groups in study design, implementation, and outcomes measurement may have far-reaching effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Solomon & Cardinale Smith & Jay Kallio & Amy Fenollosa & Barbara Benerofe & Laurence Jones & Kerin Adelson & Jason P. Gonsky & Carolyn Messner & Nina A. Bickell, 2017. "Speaking Up: How Patient and Physician Voices Shaped a Trial to Improve Goals-of-Care Discussions," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 489-501, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0226-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0226-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0226-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0226-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0226-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.