IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i4d10.1007_s40271-017-0225-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrete Choice Experiment Attribute Selection Using a Multinational Interview Study: Treatment Features Important to Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Rydén

    (AstraZeneca Gothenburg)

  • Stephanie Chen

    (AstraZeneca)

  • Emuella Flood

    (ICON plc)

  • Beverly Romero

    (ICON plc)

  • Susan Grandy

    (AstraZeneca)

Abstract

Introduction Methods for discrete choice experiment (DCE) attribute and attribute-level selection have not yet been firmly established and are rarely reported in detail. This paper describes a qualitative study designed to inform the development of a DCE survey designed to examine preferences for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatments among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods The study involved a literature review, interviews with clinical experts, and interviews with GLP-1RA-experienced (i.e., exenatide once weekly, liraglutide once daily) and injection-naïve type 2 diabetes patients from Brazil, China, Germany, Japan, and the UK. Interviews followed a semi-structured guide including open-ended questions, and probes to capture the patients’ perspective on important aspects of GLP-1RAs and concerns with injectable treatments. Qualitative analyses were performed utilizing MAXQDA version 11. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the sample. Results Thirty-two articles were reviewed, including 13 DCE studies. Thirty-one attributes were identified from the DCE studies, and 61 different attributes were identified in the non-DCE studies. Fifty patients completed interviews: 28 (56%) GLP-1RA-experienced and 22 (44%) injection-naïve, 54% were male, and they had a mean age of 52.8 years. Patients considered efficacy, adverse effects, and dosing frequency as the most important treatment-related attributes. From a list of five pre-defined device- or regimen-related attributes, patients considered dosing frequency, needle size, and injection preparation as the three most important attributes. Conclusion This study adds to the DCE literature to inform researchers on attribute selection methodology in an international setting as there is limited published information to guide researchers on best practices for selecting and defining attributes for DCE surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Rydén & Stephanie Chen & Emuella Flood & Beverly Romero & Susan Grandy, 2017. "Discrete Choice Experiment Attribute Selection Using a Multinational Interview Study: Treatment Features Important to Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 475-487, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0225-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0225-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0225-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0225-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abby Haynes & Kirsten Howard & Liam Johnson & Gavin Williams & Kelly Clanchy & Sean Tweedy & Adam Scheinberg & Sakina Chagpar & Belinda Wang & Gabrielle Vassallo & Rhys Ashpole & Catherine Sherrington, 2023. "Physical Activity Preferences of People Living with Brain Injury: Formative Qualitative Research to Develop a Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(4), pages 385-398, July.
    2. Viberg Johansson, Jennifer & Shah, Nisha & Haraldsdóttir, Eik & Bentzen, Heidi Beate & Coy, Sarah & Kaye, Jane & Mascalzoni, Deborah & Veldwijk, Jorien, 2021. "Governance mechanisms for sharing of health data: An approach towards selecting attributes for complex discrete choice experiment studies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Ellen M. Janssen & John F. P. Bridges, 2017. "Art and Science of Instrument Development for Stated-Preference Methods," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 377-379, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0225-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.