IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i4d10.1007_s40271-017-0217-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Report Card for Identifying Local Sublingual Immunotherapy Events in Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Josephine Norquist

    (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp.)

  • Emuella Flood

    (ICON COA)

  • Tiffany Tanzosh

    (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp.)

  • Haojie Li

    (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp.)

  • Beata Iskold

    (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp.)

  • Thelma Rose Ganser

    (ICON COA)

  • Helen Marson-Smith

    (ICON COA)

Abstract

Background The sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) Report Card was developed to capture patient-reported local reactions from the administration of SLIT, based on the World Allergy Organization side-effect grading system. The objective was to evaluate understandability, usability, and translatability of the paper and electronic versions of the SLIT Report Card. Methods Adults (aged 18+ years), adolescents (aged 12–17 years), and parents/caregivers and their children (aged 5–11 years) participated in two rounds of interviews, testing the paper version in Round 1, and both the paper and electronic versions in Round 2. Interviews assessed comprehension and usability by subjects. Translatability identified potential issues related to translation or cultural relevance. Results Ten adults, ten adolescents, and ten parent/child dyads were interviewed. In general, subjects demonstrated a clear understanding of the instrument’s content. However, some subjects were uncertain of or suggested clarifying the meaning of certain terms, including tablet, ulcer, taste alteration, uvula, nausea, and itching in the ear. The translatability assessment also identified uvula and nausea as potentially problematic for translation. Subjects could use the electronic device and found navigation ‘easy’, with only a few minor suggestions made to improve usability. Some wording and formatting changes were made based on subjects’ feedback and the translatability assessment. Conclusion The SLIT Report Card was refined following best practices for instrument development, including cognitive interviewing, usability, and translatability assessment. The refined SLIT Report Card is appropriate for comprehensively and systematically collecting SLIT-related local reactions directly from subjects in a clinical trial setting, taking into account the World Allergy Organization grading system.

Suggested Citation

  • Josephine Norquist & Emuella Flood & Tiffany Tanzosh & Haojie Li & Beata Iskold & Thelma Rose Ganser & Helen Marson-Smith, 2017. "Development of a Report Card for Identifying Local Sublingual Immunotherapy Events in Clinical Trials," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 439-446, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0217-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0217-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0217-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0217-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0217-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.