IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i3d10.1007_s40271-016-0207-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What’s Important to the Patient? Informational Needs of Patients Making Decisions About Hepatitis C Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Donna M. Evon

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Carol E. Golin

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Teodora Stoica

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Rachel E. Jones

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Sarah J. Willis

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Joseph Galanko

    (University of North Carolina)

  • Michael W. Fried

    (University of North Carolina)

Abstract

Background and Objectives Multiple treatment options with direct-acting antivirals are now available for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Study aims were to understand (1) the informational topics patients want to have to make informed treatment decisions; (2) the importance patients place on each topic; and (3) the topics patients prioritize as most important. Methods We used a mixed-methods study of two samples recruited from an academic liver center. Participants were not currently on treatment. Sample I (n = 45) free listed all informational topics deemed important to decision making. Raw responses were coded into several broad and subcategories. Sample II (n = 38) rated the importance of the subcategories from Sample I and ranked their highest priorities on two surveys, one containing topics for which sufficient research existed to inform patients (‘static’), and the other containing topics that would require additional research. Results The topics listed by Sample I fell into six broad categories with 17 total subcategories. The most oft-cited informational topics were harms of treatment (100%), treatment benefits (62%), and treatment regimen details (84%). Sample II rated 16 of 17 subcategories as “pretty important’ or “extremely important”. Sample II prioritized (1) viral cure, (2) long-term survival, and (3) side effects on the survey of topics requiring additional research, and (1) liver disease, (2) lifestyle changes, and (3) medication details on the second survey of the most important static topics patients needed. Conclusions Patients weighed several informational topics to make an informed decision about HCV treatment. These findings lay the groundwork for future patient-centered outcomes research in HCV and patient-provider communication to enhance patients’ informed decision making regarding direct-acting antiviral treatment options.

Suggested Citation

  • Donna M. Evon & Carol E. Golin & Teodora Stoica & Rachel E. Jones & Sarah J. Willis & Joseph Galanko & Michael W. Fried, 2017. "What’s Important to the Patient? Informational Needs of Patients Making Decisions About Hepatitis C Treatment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(3), pages 335-344, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0207-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0207-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-016-0207-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-016-0207-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0207-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.