IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/orspec/v47y2025i3d10.1007_s00291-024-00804-9.html

A machine learning approach for predicting the best heuristic for a large scaled Capacitated Lotsizing Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Kärcher

    (University of Hohenheim)

  • Herbert Meyr

    (University of Hohenheim)

Abstract

For some NP-hard lotsizing problems, many different heuristics exist, but they have different solution qualities and computation times depending on the characteristics of the instance. The computation times of the individual heuristics increase significantly with the problem size, so that testing all available heuristics for large instances requires extensive time. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a method that allows a prediction of the best heuristic for the respective instance without testing all available heuristics. The Capacitated Lotsizing Problem (CLSP) is chosen as the problem to be solved, since it is a fundamental model in the field of lotsizing, well researched and several different heuristics exist for it. The CLSP addresses the problem of determining lotsizes on a production line given limited capacity, product-dependent setup costs, and deterministic, dynamic demand for multiple products. The objective is to minimize setup and inventory holding costs. Two different forecasting methods are presented. One of them is a two-layer neural network called CLSP-Net. It is trained on small CLSP instances, which can be solved very fast with the considered heuristics. Due to the use of a fixed number of wisely chosen features that are relative, relevant, and computationally efficient, and which leverage problem-specific knowledge, CLSP-Net is also capable of predicting the most suitable heuristic for large instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Kärcher & Herbert Meyr, 2025. "A machine learning approach for predicting the best heuristic for a large scaled Capacitated Lotsizing Problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 47(3), pages 889-931, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:47:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00291-024-00804-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00291-024-00804-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00291-024-00804-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00291-024-00804-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William W. Trigeiro & L. Joseph Thomas & John O. McClain, 1989. "Capacitated Lot Sizing with Setup Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 353-366, March.
    2. van Nunen, J. A. E. E. & Wessels, J., 1978. "Multi-item lot size determination and scheduling under capacity constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 36-41, January.
    3. Gabriel R. Bitran & Horacio H. Yanasse, 1982. "Computational Complexity of the Capacitated Lot Size Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(10), pages 1174-1186, October.
    4. Gaafar, Lotfi K. & Choueiki, M. Hisham, 2000. "A neural network model for solving the lot-sizing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 175-184, April.
    5. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    6. Karina Copil & Martin Wörbelauer & Herbert Meyr & Horst Tempelmeier, 2017. "Simultaneous lotsizing and scheduling problems: a classification and review of models," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(1), pages 1-64, January.
    7. Aarts, E. H. L. & Reijnhoudt, M. F. & Stehouwer, H. P. & Wessels, J., 2000. "A novel decomposition approach for on-line lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 339-353, April.
    8. Kirca, Omer & Kokten, Melih, 1994. "A new heuristic approach for the multi-item dynamic lot sizing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 332-341, June.
    9. Lotte van Hezewijk & Nico Dellaert & Tom Van Woensel & Noud Gademann, 2023. "Using the proximal policy optimisation algorithm for solving the stochastic capacitated lot sizing problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(6), pages 1955-1978, March.
    10. Karimi, B. & Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T. & Wilson, J. M., 2003. "The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 365-378, October.
    11. Karimi-Mamaghan, Maryam & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Meyer, Patrick & Karimi-Mamaghan, Amir Mohammad & Talbi, El-Ghazali, 2022. "Machine learning at the service of meta-heuristics for solving combinatorial optimization problems: A state-of-the-art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 393-422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    2. Dziuba, Daryna & Almeder, Christian, 2023. "New construction heuristic for capacitated lot sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 906-920.
    3. Melega, Gislaine Mara & de Araujo, Silvio Alexandre & Jans, Raf, 2018. "Classification and literature review of integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 1-19.
    4. Andrea Raiconi & Julia Pahl & Monica Gentili & Stefan Voß & Raffaele Cerulli, 2017. "Tactical Production and Lot Size Planning with Lifetime Constraints: A Comparison of Model Formulations," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(05), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Taş, Duygu & Gendreau, Michel & Jabali, Ola & Jans, Raf, 2019. "A capacitated lot sizing problem with stochastic setup times and overtime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 146-159.
    6. Folarin B. Oyebolu & Jeroen Lidth de Jeude & Cyrus Siganporia & Suzanne S. Farid & Richard Allmendinger & Juergen Branke, 2017. "A new lot sizing and scheduling heuristic for multi-site biopharmaceutical production," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 231-256, August.
    7. I. Karakayali & E. Akçalı & S. Çetinkaya & H. Üster, 2013. "Capacitated replenishment and disposal planning for multiple products with resalable returns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 325-350, March.
    8. Nadjib Brahimi & Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès & Najib M. Najid, 2006. "Capacitated Multi-Item Lot-Sizing Problems with Time Windows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 951-967, October.
    9. Chen, Haoxun, 2015. "Fix-and-optimize and variable neighborhood search approaches for multi-level capacitated lot sizing problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 25-36.
    10. Karimi, B. & Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T. & Wilson, J. M., 2003. "The capacitated lot sizing problem: a review of models and algorithms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 365-378, October.
    11. Dogacan Yilmaz & İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın, 2023. "Learning Optimal Solutions via an LSTM-Optimization Framework," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-40, June.
    12. Awi Federgruen & Joern Meissner & Michal Tzur, 2007. "Progressive Interval Heuristics for Multi-Item Capacitated Lot-Sizing Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 490-502, June.
    13. Ozdamar, Linet & Birbil, Sevket Ilker, 1998. "Hybrid heuristics for the capacitated lot sizing and loading problem with setup times and overtime decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 525-547, November.
    14. Bruno, Giuseppe & Genovese, Andrea & Piccolo, Carmela, 2014. "The capacitated Lot Sizing model: A powerful tool for logistics decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 380-390.
    15. Petering, Matthew E.H. & Chen, Xi & Hsieh, Wen-Huan, 2019. "Inventory control with flexible demand: Cyclic case with multiple batch supply and demand processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 60-77.
    16. Brahimi, Nadjib & Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Nordli, Atle, 2017. "Single-item dynamic lot-sizing problems: An updated survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 838-863.
    17. Okhrin, Irena & Richter, Knut, 2011. "An O(T3) algorithm for the capacitated lot sizing problem with minimum order quantities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 507-514, June.
    18. Daniel Quadt & Heinrich Kuhn, 2009. "Capacitated lot‐sizing and scheduling with parallel machines, back‐orders, and setup carry‐over," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 366-384, June.
    19. Gislaine Mara Melega & Silvio Alexandre de Araujo & Raf Jans & Reinaldo Morabito, 2023. "Formulations and exact solution approaches for a coupled bin-packing and lot-sizing problem with sequence-dependent setups," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1276-1312, December.
    20. Brahimi, Nadjib & Dauzere-Peres, Stephane & Najid, Najib M. & Nordli, Atle, 2006. "Single item lot sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:47:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00291-024-00804-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.