IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v25y2025i3d10.1007_s12351-025-00958-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A key decision-makers-guided consensus model for group decision-making based on influence–empathetic–conflict network analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shi Rui-li

    (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)

  • Guo Chun-xiang

    (Sichuan University)

Abstract

Considering the prevalent empathy and conflict relationships present among decision-makers (DMs) from the perspective of social networks, a group consensus-reaching model based on influence–empathetic–conflict network analysis (IECNA) is constructed to study the role of empathy in the resolution of group conflicts. In this paper, we determine the empathetic utility of DMs on the basis of the assumption that empathetic utility evolves from inherent preferences through social interactions, and we measure the degree of group conflict on the basis of the empathetic utility of DMs. Three types of key DMs, namely, high conflict, high influence and high empathy, are identified via IECNA, and a key-DMs-guided consensus-reaching model is proposed. On the basis of the proposed model, we analyze the impact of empathy on group consensus-reaching processes (CRPs) through a simulation study. The results show that the empathetic relationship promotes the resolution of group conflict, and the proposed model can not only effectively improve the efficiency of CRPs but also maintain the preferences of DMs to a greater extent, thereby providing a new idea and method for effectively improving the satisfaction of group decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi Rui-li & Guo Chun-xiang, 2025. "A key decision-makers-guided consensus model for group decision-making based on influence–empathetic–conflict network analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00958-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-025-00958-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-025-00958-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-025-00958-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00958-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.