IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v96y2019i3d10.1007_s11069-019-03603-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tsunami impact assessment: development of vulnerability matrix for critical infrastructure and application to Christchurch, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • James H. Williams

    (University of Canterbury)

  • Thomas M. Wilson

    (University of Canterbury)

  • Nick Horspool

    (GNS Science)

  • Emily M. Lane

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research)

  • Matthew W. Hughes

    (University of Canterbury
    University of Canterbury)

  • Tim Davies

    (University of Canterbury)

  • Lina Le

    (University of Canterbury)

  • Finn Scheele

    (GNS Science)

Abstract

Tsunamis can have severe impacts on society. In addition to casualties and damage to buildings, they can also damage and disrupt critical infrastructure. To support effective risk management, it is important to understand the possible extent, severity and duration of these impacts. While impacts on buildings and casualty estimations are relatively well developed for tsunamis, critical infrastructure impact models are either not available or lack accurate vulnerability information. This paper addresses these issues by reviewing global tsunami impacts to critical infrastructure to develop a semi-quantitative tsunami damage matrix for critical infrastructure components and systems. One potential application of the damage matrix is demonstrated within an impact assessment process for Christchurch, New Zealand. The impact assessment determines asset damage likelihood for energy, water, telecommunication and transportation assets from a large tsunami inundation scenario. Consistent with observations from previous international tsunamis, above-ground assets and buried storm water pipe networks in Christchurch were found to perform poorly, while buried potable and waste water pipe networks were less impacted. This process provides a simple, but widely applicable, impact assessment approach which further studies can build on. Future research should focus on developing quantitative probabilistic tsunami vulnerability models for critical infrastructure that implement multiple asset standards and hazard intensity measures, and better account for uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • James H. Williams & Thomas M. Wilson & Nick Horspool & Emily M. Lane & Matthew W. Hughes & Tim Davies & Lina Le & Finn Scheele, 2019. "Tsunami impact assessment: development of vulnerability matrix for critical infrastructure and application to Christchurch, New Zealand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(3), pages 1167-1211, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:96:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03603-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03603-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03603-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-019-03603-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. Charvet & I. Ioannou & T. Rossetto & A. Suppasri & F. Imamura, 2014. "Empirical fragility assessment of buildings affected by the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami using improved statistical models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(2), pages 951-973, September.
    2. I. Charvet & A. Suppasri & H. Kimura & D. Sugawara & F. Imamura, 2015. "A multivariate generalized linear tsunami fragility model for Kesennuma City based on maximum flow depths, velocities and debris impact, with evaluation of predictive accuracy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 2073-2099, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa Vera San Martín & Gary Rodriguez Rosado & Patricia Arreaga Vargas & Leonardo Gutierrez, 2018. "Population and building vulnerability assessment by possible worst-case tsunami scenarios in Salinas, Ecuador," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 275-297, August.
    2. Mohammadreza Vafaei & Sophia C. Alih, 2018. "Seismic vulnerability of air traffic control towers," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(2), pages 803-822, January.
    3. F. Dall’Osso & D. Dominey-Howes & C. Tarbotton & S. Summerhayes & G. Withycombe, 2016. "Revision and improvement of the PTVA-3 model for assessing tsunami building vulnerability using “international expert judgment”: introducing the PTVA-4 model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 1229-1256, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:96:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03603-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.