IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v78y2015i2p973-993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of ash cloud modelling with satellite retrievals: a case study of the 16–17 June 1996 Mount Ruapehu eruption

Author

Listed:
  • J. Liu
  • J. Salmond
  • K. Dirks
  • J. Lindsay

Abstract

Volcanic ash can be hazardous to aviation and human health; hence, there is a need to be able to accurately forecast the dispersion of ash clouds in real time. This relies, in part, on the choice of suitable input parameters for the modelling of a given eruption event, often when data from the actual eruption are not yet available. In this paper, the sensitivity of a coupled modelling system, consisting of the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, namely FLEXPART-WRF, to varying eruption source parameters is examined through comparison of modelled ash clouds with satellite data for the 16–17 June 1996 eruption of Mount Ruapehu, New Zealand. The model is evaluated using the probability of detection, false alarm ratio and Critical Success Index statistical analyses. The eruption source parameters considered in the ash cloud modelling are: the eruption duration, the mass eruption rate, the particle density, the number of particles, the plume height, the particle size distribution and the plume ratio (defined as the ratio of the thickness of the laterally spreading ash cloud at the plume top to the height of the plume). We allowed the plume height, plume ratio and particle size distribution to vary in order to carry out the sensitivity experiments. Our results indicate that for this eruption: (1) the plume ratio has a large effect on the model prediction of ash clouds dispersion; (2) the uncertainties associated with the plume heights retrieved from satellite data do not have a significant impact on the model prediction of ash cloud dispersion; and (3) the particle size distribution of fine ash has little effect on the model prediction of ash cloud dispersion. Moreover, the results show that the ash cloud forecasts are only accurate for a comparatively short period of time (up to 11 h) due to the limitations associated with WRF model. Further analysis is needed to investigate the general applicability of the method. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • J. Liu & J. Salmond & K. Dirks & J. Lindsay, 2015. "Validation of ash cloud modelling with satellite retrievals: a case study of the 16–17 June 1996 Mount Ruapehu eruption," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(2), pages 973-993, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:78:y:2015:i:2:p:973-993
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1753-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-015-1753-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-015-1753-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Tupper & Christiane Textor & Michael Herzog & Hans-F. Graf & Michael Richards, 2009. "Tall clouds from small eruptions: the sensitivity of eruption height and fine ash content to tropospheric instability," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 51(2), pages 375-401, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adele Bear-Crozier & Solène Pouget & Marcus Bursik & Emile Jansons & Jarrad Denman & Andrew Tupper & Rose Rustowicz, 2020. "Automated detection and measurement of volcanic cloud growth: towards a robust estimate of mass flux, mass loading and eruption duration," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(1), pages 1-38, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:78:y:2015:i:2:p:973-993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.