IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v57y2011i2p369-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential source zones for Himalayan earthquakes: constraints from spatial–temporal clusters

Author

Listed:
  • Basab Mukhopadhyay
  • Anshuman Acharyya
  • Sujit Dasgupta

Abstract

The Himalayan fold-thrust belt has been visited by many disastrous earthquakes (magnitude > 6) time and again. This active collisional orogen bordering Indian subcontinent in the north remains a potential seismic threat of similar magnitude in the adjoining countries like India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan and China. Though earthquake forecasting is riddled with all conjectures and still not a proven presumption, identifying likely source zones of such disastrous earthquakes would be an important contribution to seismic hazard assessment. In this study, we have worked out spatio-temporal clustering of earthquakes (Mb ≥ 4.5; 1964–2006) in the Himalayas. ‘Point density’ spatial statistics has helped in detecting 22 spatial seismicity clusters. Earthquake catalog is then treated with a moving time-distance window technique (inter-event time 35 days and distance 100 ± 20 km) to bring out temporal clusters by recognizing several foreshock-main shock-aftershock (FMA) sequences. A total of 53 such temporal sequences identified in the process are confined within the 22 spatial clusters. Though each of these spatio-temporal clusters deserves in-depth analysis, we short-listed only eight such clusters that are dissected by active tectonic discontinuities like MBT/MCT for detail study. Spatio-temporal clusters have been used to constrain the potential source zones. These eight well-defined spatio-temporal clusters demonstrate recurrent moderate to large earthquakes. We assumed that the length of these clusters are indicating the possible maximum rupture lengths and thus empirically estimated the maximum possible magnitudes of eight clusters that can be generated from them (from west to east) as 8.0, 8.3, 8.2, 8.3, 8.2, 8.4, 8.0 and 7.7. Based on comparative study of the eight cluster zones contemplating with their temporal recurrences, historical seismic records, presence of intersecting faults and estimated magnitudes, we have guessed the possibility that Kangra, East Nepal, Garhwal and Kumaun–West Nepal clusters, in decreasing order of earthquake threat, are potential source zones for large earthquakes (≥7.7 M) in future. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Basab Mukhopadhyay & Anshuman Acharyya & Sujit Dasgupta, 2011. "Potential source zones for Himalayan earthquakes: constraints from spatial–temporal clusters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 57(2), pages 369-383, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:57:y:2011:i:2:p:369-383
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-010-9618-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-010-9618-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-010-9618-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicole Feldl & Roger Bilham, 2006. "Great Himalayan earthquakes and the Tibetan plateau," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7116), pages 165-170, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anil Tiwari & Ajay Paul & Rakesh Singh & Rajeev Upadhyay, 2021. "Potential seismogenic asperities in the Garhwal–Kumaun region, NW Himalaya: seismotectonic implications," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 73-95, May.
    2. A. Vanuvamalai & K. P. Jaya & V. Balachandran, 2018. "Seismic performance of tunnel structures: a case study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 453-468, August.
    3. Babita Sharma & Sumer Chopra & Vikas Kumar, 2016. "Simulation of strong ground motion for 1905 Kangra earthquake and a possible megathrust earthquake (Mw 8.5) in western Himalaya (India) using Empirical Green’s Function technique," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(1), pages 487-503, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Vanuvamalai & K. P. Jaya & V. Balachandran, 2018. "Seismic performance of tunnel structures: a case study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 453-468, August.
    2. Tom R. Robinson, 2020. "Scenario ensemble modelling of possible future earthquake impacts in Bhutan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3457-3478, September.
    3. A. Mahajan & V. Thakur & Mukat Sharma & Mukesh Chauhan, 2010. "Probabilistic seismic hazard map of NW Himalaya and its adjoining area, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 53(3), pages 443-457, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:57:y:2011:i:2:p:369-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.