Author
Listed:
- V. Gitis
- R. Tatevossian
- A. Vainshtock
Abstract
Different approaches to seismic hazard assessment are compared. Each of them could be applied more or less successfully for territories which are stable in time and have a high level of seismic activity. A long-term seismic catalogue, not only including historical but also paleoearthquake data, is an essential requirement. But, in practice, such an ideal situation is very rare. Initial data is usually poor and short-term. Seismic hazard assessment could be more complicated for regions which are transient between relatively stable platforms and active mountain massifs. A new step in geoinformation technology for seismic hazard assessment based on a GEO computer environment is presented, its application is illustrated by the real case hazard evaluation for the territory of the Stavropol region, which is situated between the Russian platform and the Great Caucasus. The regional catalogue covers a time period of about 150 years. Though the region under consideration is not large, seismic activity is variable in space, from almost aseismic zones to rather active areas. GEO allows us to incorporate different techniques and all available information in the analysis, including those which are very difficult to formalize. The space distribution of the maximum expected earthquake magnitude is determined as a function of geological and geophysical data. An important feature of GEO is that it makes it possible to control the result of complicated algorithms through some relatively simple physical reasons. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998
Suggested Citation
V. Gitis & R. Tatevossian & A. Vainshtock, 1998.
"Maximum Expected Magnitude Assessment in a Geo Computer Environment: Case Study,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 17(3), pages 225-250, May.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:17:y:1998:i:3:p:225-250
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008021903601
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:17:y:1998:i:3:p:225-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.