IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v16y1997i2p165-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problems for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • D. Speidel
  • P. Mattson

Abstract

The use of b-values derived from the Gutenberg–Richter relationship as a phenomenological base for developing probabilistic seismic hazard analyses (PSHA) has been questioned for years. The relationship is still used because political demands require something for PSHA, one variable is easy to deal with, and no persuasive alternative has come forward. Using cumulative distribution probability plots, it can be shown that seismic magnitude-frequency data can be well described as one or more populations, each of which is normally distributed with respect to magnitude. This holds true for large earthquakes when sorted by mechanism, for earthquakes >400 km deep, for the general USGS NEIC catalog, for the Harvard CMT catalog, for the CERI catalog of the New Madrid Zone, and for a Scandinavian catalog. In all instances, multiple normal populations provide a better fit to the data than does the Gutenberg–Richter relationship. Use of these multiple populations in PSHA emphasizes that the scientifically sound limits of magnitude projection are within the 4σ limit of the largest populations. Such graphs may make it easier to resist political requirement to extrapolate into scientifically unsound regions. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Suggested Citation

  • D. Speidel & P. Mattson, 1997. "Problems for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:16:y:1997:i:2:p:165-179
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1007976907691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1007976907691
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1007976907691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:16:y:1997:i:2:p:165-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.