Author
Listed:
- Shaohua Gao
(China Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences
Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geological Safety, Ministry of Natural Resources)
- Yueping Yin
(China Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring
Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geological Safety, Ministry of Natural Resources)
- Yang Gao
(Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences
Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geological Safety, Ministry of Natural Resources)
- Bin Li
(Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences
Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geological Safety, Ministry of Natural Resources)
- Wenpei Wang
(China Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring
Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geological Safety, Ministry of Natural Resources)
- Jihuan Wu
(China Geological Survey)
- Nan Zhang
(China Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring
Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geological Safety, Ministry of Natural Resources)
- Xiaojie Liu
(Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geological Safety, Ministry of Natural Resources
Lanzhou University of Technology)
- Chenghu Lu
(Institute of Geophysics)
Abstract
On November 18, 2017, a magnitude Ms 6.9 earthquake struck the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon area, Tibet Autonomous Region, China, with a focal depth of 10 km, and the area of the intensity VIII zone was about 310 km2, triggering thousands of coseismic landslides. The assessment of landslide hazard risks is of great significance for emergency response. To enhance the computational accuracy of the Newmark displacement model while preserving its simplicity, efficiency, and practical applicability. This paper proposes a refined landslide susceptibility assessment method that comprehensively considers geological and dynamic surface deformation information. According to the InSAR deformation monitoring results, the maximum deformation in the ascending track images exceeded 11 cm, and the maximum deformation in the descending track images exceeded 7 cm. Using InSAR to obtain the spatial distribution characteristics of surface deformation before and after the earthquake, we corrected the Newmark displacement results and found that the maximum displacement reached 28.86 cm, with the main deformation concentrated within about 17 km on both sides of the fault, consistent with the InSAR results. Based on the corrected model parameters, the probability of potential earthquake-induced landslides in the study area was calculated for four ground motion exceedance probabilities over 50 years: 63%, 10%, 2%, and 0.01%. Under the 0.01% exceedance probability, the area of extremely high-risk zones is 1040.05 km2, widely distributed on steep glacier slopes and slope areas along rivers and valleys, with a total area of potential landslides reaching 9695.89 km2.Under different exceedance probabilities, parts of the area near Gyala Peri Peak and Namjagbarwa remain in high-risk zones, and are prone to high-altitude remote geological hazards under strong earthquakes and extreme rainfall, requiring close attention. The results support the prediction and assessment of potential earthquake-induced landslide hazards in the region, as well as the rapid post-earthquake landslide evaluation.
Suggested Citation
Shaohua Gao & Yueping Yin & Yang Gao & Bin Li & Wenpei Wang & Jihuan Wu & Nan Zhang & Xiaojie Liu & Chenghu Lu, 2025.
"Seismic landslide probabilistic assessment using Newmark displacement and remote-sensing: insights from 2017 Milin Ms 6.9 earthquake, eastern Himalayan Syntaxis,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(9), pages 11095-11116, May.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07179-2
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07179-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07179-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.