IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i7d10.1007_s11069-025-07151-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of several site-condition proxies and ground-motion intensity measures on the spectral amplification factor using neuro-fuzzy approach: an example on the KiK-Net dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Akram Ismail Zaoui

    (Dr Moulay Tahar University)

  • Boumédiène Derras

    (Dr Moulay Tahar University
    Abou Bekr Belkaïd University)

  • Julie Régnier

    (CEREMA Méditerranée)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to utilize noted machine learning algorithm to examine the impact of 22 Site Condition Proxies (SCPs) and 3 Ground Motion Intensity Measurements (GMIMs) on the Response Spectral Amplification Factor (SAF). The SAF represents the ratio of Pseudo-Spectral Acceleration with 5% damping between surface and downhole measurements, with the downhole data serving as the reference site. The 22 SCPs include average shear velocities at various depths (VS10, VS20, VS30, VS50, VS100), Average shear wave velocity from the ground surface up to the depth at which shear velocity reaches 800 m/s, so-called H800 (VS800), mean shear velocity to the total depth of the profile (Vsmean), minimum and maximum shear velocities (Vsmin, Vsmax), shear wave velocity at the location of the borehole instrument (Vszhole), contrast velocities (CVs), gradient velocity to 30 m (B30), topographic slope, depth at which shear velocity reaches 800 m/s (H800), and frequency peaks of the site response (fn). The 3 GMIMs consist of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity (PGV), and a proxy for maximum strain (PGV/VS30). This SAF is developed using a subset of the KiK-Net database and employs the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) machine learning algorithm. The input variables of the model are the SCPs and GMIMs, while the target variables are the SAF values at different periods, ranging from 0.01 to 4 s. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify the most relevant SCPs and GMIMs, using the variance reduction coefficient (RC) as a metric to evaluate model performance. Among the GMIMs, PGV/VS30 is identified as the most effective. However, no single SCP is found to be relevant across all periods; therefore, a combination of two SCPs is chosen, with the optimal pair being [f0HV: fundamental resonance frequency using horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio, CV2 = Vsmax/VS30,]. The final combination includes [f0HV, CV2, PGV/VS30]. This combination accounts for the different characteristics of SCPs, such as rigidity and depth, as well as a ground motion intensity parameter. The ANFIS model is validated through three methods: comparison with models proposed by (Earth Planets Sp 69:1–21, 10.1186/s40623-017-0718-z, 2017; Bull Earthq Eng 17:119–139, 10.1007/s10518-018-0459-9, 2019), testing with the same data used in the training phase, and validation with new data (Bahrampouri et al. in Earthq Spectra 37:505–522, 10.1177/8755293020952447, 2021). This sensitivity study and the developed model aim to enhance the consideration of local site effects, both for seismic code revisions and site-specific studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Akram Ismail Zaoui & Boumédiène Derras & Julie Régnier, 2025. "Impact of several site-condition proxies and ground-motion intensity measures on the spectral amplification factor using neuro-fuzzy approach: an example on the KiK-Net dataset," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(7), pages 8703-8732, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07151-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07151-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07151-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07151-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07151-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.