Author
Abstract
In this study, quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) for 24-h Mei-yu rainfall at the short range (days 1–3) during May-June of 2012–2014 by a cloud model at two different grid sizes of 2.5 and 5 km are compared using point-to-point categorical measures. With strong topographic control and enhancement, abundant Mei-yu rainfall in Taiwan allows for the use of very high thresholds up to 500 mm (per 24 h), and classification based on observations is also performed to isolate the larger 16% (group A) and the largest 4% of events (group A+) from all samples. Our results show clear improvements in threat scores in heavy rainfall, with the greatest gain (by 0.16) on day 1 at the highest threshold adopted (500 mm) in the largest events of group A+, when a finer grid is used. Improvements are seen at thresholds ≥ 200 mm on day 1, ≥ 100 mm on day 2, and over 50–350 mm on day 3, mainly due to a better capability of the finer model to simulate heavy rainfall in larger events over and near the terrain. The present work provides new insights into the importance and usefulness of increasing model resolution, when and if QPFs of heavy rainfall at precise locations are crucial for hazard mitigation. Similar benefits are not as evident in the literature, likely because the thresholds used were not high enough, the larger events were not isolated, or the impact of topography on rainfall is not as strong and apparent as in Taiwan.
Suggested Citation
Chung-Chieh Wang & Pi-Yu Chuang & Kazuhisa Tsuboki, 2025.
"Where and why do Mei-yu season Heavy-rainfall quantitative precipitation forecasts in Taiwan improve the most using a higher model resolution,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(1), pages 383-403, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06825-5
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06825-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06825-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.