IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i18d10.1007_s11069-025-07668-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing glacial lake outburst flood risk in the Eastern Himalayas: a Bayesian neural network framework

Author

Listed:
  • Anushka Vashistha

    (Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati)

  • Ajay Dashora

    (Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati)

  • Afroz Ahmad Shah

    (University of Brunei Darussalam (UBD))

Abstract

Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) represent a growing global hazard with increasing impacts in high-mountain regions across Asia, South America, and the Arctic. In the Eastern Himalayas, the frequency and intensity of GLOFs have risen markedly over the past three decades, driven by accelerated glacier retreat, altered precipitation patterns, and unregulated development in downstream valleys. However, systematic risk assessment remains limited, constrained by insufficient understanding of glacier–lake interactions and the lack of predictive models that integrate hazard complexity and uncertainty. These deficiencies weaken the effectiveness of early warning systems and adaptation strategies, not only in the Himalayas but also in other vulnerable mountain regions worldwide. This study presents a robust, two-stage methodology to assess GLOF risk in the Eastern Himalayas, offering a scalable framework relevant to other glaciated regions. In the first stage, we employ a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach integrating 14 parameters—including topographic configuration, geomorphology, hazard proximity, meteorological extremes, and anthropogenic exposure—weighted using a hybrid of Shannon Entropy and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This model classifies glacial lakes into four GLOF risk categories: low, moderate, high, and very high. In the second stage, we implement a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) to replicate and refine the initial classification while quantifying predictive uncertainty—marking the first application of BNNs in GLOF risk science. The model achieves an overall accuracy of 93.4%, identifying 66 low-risk, 74 moderate-risk, 56 high-risk, and 18 very high-risk lakes. Importantly, 87.77% of lakes exhibit predictive variance below 0.1, and none exceed 0.165, indicating high model reliability across risk categories. By integrating expert-driven decision-making with uncertainty-aware machine learning, this research offers a globally relevant advancement in GLOF hazard assessment. The methodology provides a transferable template for other climate-sensitive mountain regions facing similar threats. It supports the development of more adaptive, evidence-based disaster risk reduction strategies aligned with global frameworks such as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the UN Sustainable Development Goal. In an era of accelerating cryosphere change, such predictive and scalable approaches are critical for safeguarding downstream communities, infrastructure, and transboundary water security.

Suggested Citation

  • Anushka Vashistha & Ajay Dashora & Afroz Ahmad Shah, 2025. "Assessing glacial lake outburst flood risk in the Eastern Himalayas: a Bayesian neural network framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(18), pages 21861-21890, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:18:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07668-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07668-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07668-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07668-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:18:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07668-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.