Author
Abstract
Developing multihazard susceptibility maps is a practical approach for improving environmental planning and supporting crisis management efforts. In this study, the Khuzestan Province in Iran was selected as the case area to evaluate susceptibility to two major environmental hazards: dust storms and drought. First, a dust storm susceptibility map was generated using four machine-learning algorithms: support vector machine (SVM), boosted regression tree (BRT), random forest (RF), and maximum entropy (MaxEnt). Second, a drought susceptibility map was created based on the standardized precipitation index (SPI). These two maps were then combined to produce a multihazard susceptibility map that reflected the spatial overlap of both hazards. Among the models, the RF algorithm yielded the highest predictive performance with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.94. The results showed that the southern and southwestern areas of the province were the most susceptible to dust storms. For drought, the SPI results indicated that the southern, southwestern, and western parts of the province experienced drought conditions, whereas the eastern and northwestern regions were more humid. In the final stage, the susceptibility of urban infrastructure and agricultural land to these two hazards was assessed. The findings revealed that 29.88% of industrial zones and 8.89% of residential areas fell within the “very high” susceptibility class for dust storms. The outcomes of this study offer valuable input for crisis planning and land management, providing a province-scale multihazard framework aimed at minimizing potential environmental stress on infrastructure.
Suggested Citation
Soheila Pouyan & Mojgan Bordbar & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2025.
"Mapping dust storms and drought susceptibility: a multihazard approach for reducing infrastructure risk,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(18), pages 21505-21529, November.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:18:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07650-0
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07650-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:18:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07650-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.