IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i18d10.1007_s11069-025-07626-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of community assets: a survey of coastal Oregonians’ priorities for natural hazard preparedness

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Y. J. Mah

    (Oregon State University)

  • Jenna Tilt

    (Oregon State University)

  • Joshua Blockstein

    (Oregon State University)

  • Natasha Fox

    (Oregon Department of Emergency Management)

  • Najiba Rashid

    (Oregon State University)

  • Amina E. Meselhe

    (Oregon State University)

  • Felicia N. S. Olmeta Schult

    (Oregon State University)

Abstract

Oregon coastal communities are exposed to numerous natural hazards including coastal erosion, sea-level rise, storms, tsunamis, which they must prepare for. Identifying assets in a community which support the various needs of a community helps to determine which places need to be protected before disasters occur, and which could be used to support disaster recovery. In the current study, we surveyed residents of coastal Oregon communities (N = 524) to identify what assets are important to community members, including which places they value, which places they believe should be protected from disasters, and the characteristics that they value in those places. Coastal residents highly valued places which provide access to nature, such as beaches and parks and built places that provided both private and public services. Natural and built places with public services were valued because survey respondents saw them as places which support their well-being, but built places with private and public services were seen as more important for their support of essential services. Respondents also identified the places that they believe should be protected before a disaster occurs, and actions they think their communities should take to mitigate disaster impacts. Participants recognized the need to protect facilities essential to health and safety such as hospitals prior to disaster, but primarily wanted places where the community gathers and which would allow for connections with the community (e.g., community centers) to be protected. Both places identified by survey respondents desired for protection against natural hazards and those that they intrinsically valued in general varied depending on demographic characteristics, highlighting the need for broad and diverse participation in planning efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Y. J. Mah & Jenna Tilt & Joshua Blockstein & Natasha Fox & Najiba Rashid & Amina E. Meselhe & Felicia N. S. Olmeta Schult, 2025. "Identification of community assets: a survey of coastal Oregonians’ priorities for natural hazard preparedness," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(18), pages 21385-21403, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:18:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07626-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07626-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07626-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07626-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:18:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07626-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.