IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i17d10.1007_s11069-025-07645-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative landslide risk analysis with limited dataset by leveraging geospatial approaches in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Dian Nuraini Melati

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Astisiasari Astisiasari

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Raditya Panji Umbara

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Wisyanto Wisyanto

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Sukristiyanti Sukristiyanti

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Yukni Arifianti

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Syakira Trisnafiah

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Trinugroho Trinugroho

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Taufik Iqbal Ramdhani

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Ahmad Luthfi Hadiyanto

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Argo Galih Suhadha

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Diyah Krisna Yuliana

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Muhammad Iqbal Habibie

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Ritha Riyandari

    (National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))

  • Jarot Mulyo Semedi

    (University of Indonesia)

  • Guruh Samodra

    (Gadjah Mada University)

Abstract

Landslide risk analysis is a key process in mitigating adverse losses. However, in an area with a limited dataset, the assessment can be challenging. Accordingly, this study aims to analyze the landslide risk within a data scarcity environment by leveraging the open-access geospatial data with ground checks. This study estimated the landslide risk in the District of Sukajaya, Regency of Bogor, Indonesia, by overlaying the landslide hazard and vulnerabilities that were exemplified by the exposed elements. This study utilized the available dataset on historical landslides and conditional factors to generate the spatial (susceptibility) and temporal probabilities for the landslide hazard. The spatial probability evaluated two robust approaches, i.e., machine learning-based (i.e., Random Forest) and deep learning-based (i.e., TabNet) methods for the Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM). The result revealed that the TabNet-based LSM outperformed the Random Forest-based LSM. Moreover, the landslide exposures were quantified from the open-access dataset for populations and buildings. The resulting landslide risk estimated that the Sukajaya District had a total building risk of IDR 1.20 trillion at 4.88 $$\text {km}^2$$ and a total population risk of 39,204 people, or around 58.58% of the total population. This study is beneficial for policymakers and authorities in mitigating the prevailing landslide disaster and thus, achieving better sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Dian Nuraini Melati & Astisiasari Astisiasari & Raditya Panji Umbara & Wisyanto Wisyanto & Sukristiyanti Sukristiyanti & Yukni Arifianti & Syakira Trisnafiah & Trinugroho Trinugroho & Taufik Iqbal Ram, 2025. "Quantitative landslide risk analysis with limited dataset by leveraging geospatial approaches in Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(17), pages 20453-20487, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:17:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07645-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07645-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07645-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07645-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:17:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07645-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.