IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i17d10.1007_s11069-025-07589-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of the internet of things in flood risk management: a critical review on current practices and future directions

Author

Listed:
  • Vahid Bakhtiari

    (Deakin University)

  • Hamed Darabi Kerchi

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Farzad Piadeh

    (University of Hertfordshire)

  • Kourosh Behzadian

    (University of West London)

  • Farnad Nasirzadeh

    (Deakin University)

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) has become increasingly important in flood risk management (FRM). This trend emerged as climate change intensified flooding events, driving the urgent need for localised early warning systems. Previous studies demonstrated the effectiveness of IoT sensors in forecasting potential floods and supporting flood modelling. However, comprehensive research addressing all FRM stages - prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery - has remained limited. To address this research gap, this study identified five key IoT sensor categories: water quantity, water quality, rainfall intensity, weather conditions, and catchment characteristics. The roles, objectives, and applications of these sensors across FRM stages were then investigated. Results showed that water quantity sensors were the most common, accounting for 48% of documented IoT applications. Weather condition sensors (27%) and rainfall intensity sensors (21%) were also widely used, especially after 2021. Additionally, IoT-based FRM had three primary Objectives flood modelling (61%), alerting (25%), and visualisation (14%). Most cases (42%) focused on the preparedness stage, while prevention (8%) and recovery (5%) were underrepresented, highlighting clear gaps in existing research. The review also revealed several overlooked sensor types, including groundwater level, biochemical oxygen demand, and nitrite sensors. Despite their potential to enhance quality-based flood modelling, these sensors were rarely utilised. Consequently, the study emphasised the need for broader integration of IoT sensors throughout all FRM stages. Such integration could support more resilient, data-driven flood management strategies, particularly in regions where IoT deployment has remained limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Vahid Bakhtiari & Hamed Darabi Kerchi & Farzad Piadeh & Kourosh Behzadian & Farnad Nasirzadeh, 2025. "Role of the internet of things in flood risk management: a critical review on current practices and future directions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(17), pages 19473-19505, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:17:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07589-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07589-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07589-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07589-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:17:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07589-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.