IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i17d10.1007_s11069-025-07588-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating earthquake impacts in Oslo, Norway: a multi-method approach

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Ghione

    (NORSAR
    University of Oslo)

  • Sergio Molina Palacios

    (University of Alicante)

  • Anita Torabi

    (University of Oslo)

  • Volker Oye

    (NORSAR
    University of Oslo)

Abstract

In this study, we conducted a comprehensive seismic risk assessment for Oslo (capital of Norway), integrating both deterministic and probabilistic approaches to capture a holistic view of potential earthquake impacts. Based on the field data from exposed major faults in the Oslo rift margin and historical earthquakes in this region, the deterministic analysis examined three scenarios: (i) an Mw 5.4 earthquake that occurred in 1904 in the Oslo rift zone; (ii) a hypothetical Mw 6.0 event on the east side of the rift zone (Østmarka event), and (iii) a hypothetical Mw 6.0 event along an exposed fault zone in the central rift zone (Nesodden event). Among the three scenarios, the Østmarka event resulted in the highest losses, while the 1904 scenario showed negligible impact. In both the Østmarka and the 475-year return period probabilistic scenarios, Sentrum and Frogner neighbourhoods consistently emerged as the most affected areas. This is primarily due to a combination of local soil conditions and the prevalence of unreinforced masonry buildings, highlighting the critical interplay between physical hazard and locally specific vulnerability associated with the neighbourhood’s particular characteristics. The combination of deterministic and probabilistic approaches offers a detailed and nuanced understanding of seismic risks in Oslo. The findings underscore the need for targeted mitigation efforts and preparedness strategies, particularly in neighbourhoods that are more susceptible to seismic risks. By integrating these comprehensive risk assessments, the study provides valuable insights into the uneven distribution of seismic risk across Oslo. The results aim to inform local authorities and policymakers, aiding in the development of effective strategies to enhance the resilience of the city’s infrastructure and population against future seismic events.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Ghione & Sergio Molina Palacios & Anita Torabi & Volker Oye, 2025. "Evaluating earthquake impacts in Oslo, Norway: a multi-method approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(17), pages 19781-19809, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:17:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07588-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07588-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07588-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07588-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:17:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07588-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.