IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i16d10.1007_s11069-025-07572-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing scales for disaster risk perception and coping: a psychosocial perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Aslı Altanlar

    (Amasya University)

  • Harun Ceylan

    (Amasya University)

  • Rabia Karamustafa

    (Amasya University)

  • Süleyman Tuğrul Kılıç

    (Amasya University)

Abstract

This study aims to develop valid and reliable measurement tools to assess disaster risk perception and coping strategies, thereby contributing to the design of effective disaster management policies. Two original scales were utilised: the Disaster Risk Perception and Coping Scale (DRPCS) and the Disaster Risk Management and Psychosocial Outcomes Scale (DRMPOS). Data were collected via an online survey from 505 participants across diverse demographic and geographic backgrounds in Türkiye. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses validated the structural integrity of both scales. The DRPCS revealed three factors—Disaster Awareness and Anxiety (α = 0.957), Fatalistic Beliefs (α = 0.729), and Preparedness and Coping (α = 0.902) —while the DRMPOS identified two dimensions—Disaster Experience and Psychosocial Impacts (α = 0.938), and Pre- and Post-Disaster Actions (α = 0.894). Fit indices indicated acceptable model fit (DRPCS: χ²/df = 2.770, CFI = 0.924, RMSEA = 0.0786; DRMPOS: χ²/df = 3.525, CFI = 0.960, TLI = 0.979, RMSEA = 0.101). Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) revealed that the DRMPOS significantly predicted subscales of the DRPCS. Notably, disaster experience and psychosocial impacts had a positive influence on awareness and anxiety (β = 0.525), while fatalistic beliefs negatively affected preparedness. Pre- and post-disaster actions had a moderate effect on proactive coping strategies. These findings underscore the pivotal role of psychosocial factors in disaster preparedness. They indicate that support mechanisms and targeted interventions are crucial for enhancing both individual and community-level resilience. The study highlights the importance of integrating cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions into disaster risk reduction strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Aslı Altanlar & Harun Ceylan & Rabia Karamustafa & Süleyman Tuğrul Kılıç, 2025. "Developing scales for disaster risk perception and coping: a psychosocial perspective," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(16), pages 19277-19295, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:16:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07572-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07572-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07572-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07572-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:16:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07572-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.