Author
Abstract
Early detection of earthquakes is very important to prevent possible loss of life and injuries. Türkiye faces frequent earthquake disasters due to its geographical location. In order to predict the possible earthquake risk with artificial intelligence methods, data is required. This paper explores the potential of synthetic data generation, focusing on the data constraint in simulating earthquake data and further analyzing disaster scenarios. TGAN, CTGAN and CopulaGAN models are compared using real earthquake dataset obtained from Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality open data portal. The results show that the TGAN model achieves the highest performance in both statistical and structural metrics. TGAN produced results close to the real data in terms of mean (19.53 vs. 19.84) and cumulative total (27,269.58), and obtained the highest value (0.9022) in correlation analysis. Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test and chi-squared (CS) test results showed that all models modeled discrete attributes better, while the logistic regression classifier TGAN performed moderately well in distinguishing real data from synthetic data. These findings reveal that the TGAN model is an effective tool in the synthetic generation of earthquake data and offers new perspectives in disaster management processes. As one of the first comprehensive comparisons of the potential of GAN models for synthetic generation of earthquake data, this study makes an innovative contribution to the literature in terms of both model selection guidelines and synthetic data applications.
Suggested Citation
Hayrullah Urcan & Emine Cengil & Murat Canayaz, 2025.
"Comparative analysis of TGAN and other GAN models for synthetic earthquake data: a case study with data from Türkiye,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(16), pages 19239-19259, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:16:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07569-6
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07569-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:16:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07569-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.