IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i12d10.1007_s11069-025-07363-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flood prediction: analyzing land use scenarios and strategies in Sumber Brantas and Kali Konto watersheds in East Java, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Aditya Nugraha Putra

    (Brawijaya University
    Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava)

  • Salsabila Fitri Alfaani

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Danny Dwi Saputra

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Yosi Andhika

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Erwin Ismu Wisnubroto

    (Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University)

  • Fandy Tri Admajaya

    (Geospatial Information Agency)

  • Febrian Maritimo

    (Geospatial Information Agency)

  • Saskia Karyna Paimin

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Irma Ardi Kusumawati

    (Yayasan Bumi Hijau Lestari)

  • Novandi Rizky Prasetya

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Michelle Talisia Sugiarto

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Istika Nita

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Sudarto Sudarto

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Sujarwo Sujarwo

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Mochtar Lutfi Rayes

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Didik Suprayogo

    (Brawijaya University)

  • Mohd. Hasmadi Ismail

    (Universiti Putra Malaysia)

  • Meine van Noordwijk

    (Centre of International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF)
    Wageningen University and Research)

Abstract

Previous studies have emphasized the significant influence of land use and land cover (LULC) on flood hazard severity. However, the analysis has been restricted to a single dataset and scenario. This study is carried out to analyze the land use options for flood prediction by examining three distinct scenarios namely business as usual (BAU), regional spatial planning (RSP), and land capability (LC). The BAU (2025) scenario was forecasted by using a multitemporal LULC baseline (2017, 2019, 2021 and 2022) and modelled with the ANN Cellular Automata-Markov Chain. The RSP and LC scenarios were developed based on the official regional spatial planning of Malang Regency and Batu City, while LC was developed through the land capability classification limiting factor method. These scenarios were applied to predict flood levels using the InVEST model, incorporating factors such as rainfall depth, hydrologic soil group, curve number, and a biophysical table for infiltration analysis, by using SCS Curve Number analysis in InVEST. The result shows a decline in forest cover (from 31 to 23%) and agroforestry (from 3 to 2%) to correspond with a 16% increase in flood hazard levels. This correlation was identified using pearson model and validated (Kappa accuracy) through ground-check surveys, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 75%. If there are no interventions, high and very high flood hazard levels could escalate to 12% and 4% in 2025. In contrast, the RSP and LC scenarios show promise in reducing flood hazards by 16% and 10%, respectively. Remarkably, the LC scenario has shown to be the most effective strategy for the land use approach, showcasing a potential to prevent flood hazards because it maintains the existence of forests according to their land capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Aditya Nugraha Putra & Salsabila Fitri Alfaani & Danny Dwi Saputra & Yosi Andhika & Erwin Ismu Wisnubroto & Fandy Tri Admajaya & Febrian Maritimo & Saskia Karyna Paimin & Irma Ardi Kusumawati & Novand, 2025. "Flood prediction: analyzing land use scenarios and strategies in Sumber Brantas and Kali Konto watersheds in East Java, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(12), pages 15025-15053, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07363-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07363-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07363-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07363-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Karina Winkler & Richard Fuchs & Mark Rounsevell & Martin Herold, 2021. "Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Hailu, Alemenesh & Mammo, Siraj & Kidane, Moges, 2020. "Dynamics of land use, land cover change trend and its drivers in Jimma Geneti District, Western Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. de Jong, Johan & Poorter, Lourens & de Jong, Wil & Bongers, Frans & Lohbeck, Madelon & Veenendaal, Elmar & Meave, Jorge A. & Jakovac, Catarina C. & Brancalion, Pedro H.S. & Amissah, Lucy & Martínez-Ra, 2025. "Dissecting forest transition: Contribution of mature forests, second-growth forests and tree plantations to tree cover dynamics in the tropics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Maysoon A A Osman & Elfatih M Abdel-Rahman & Joshua Orungo Onono & Lydia A Olaka & Muna M Elhag & Marian Adan & Henri E Z Tonnang, 2023. "Mapping, intensities and future prediction of land use/land cover dynamics using google earth engine and CA- artificial neural network model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Yujin Lu & Xingmeng Xu & Gaoru Zhu & Yuting Peng & Yi Li & Xueyan Zhao, 2024. "Land Space and High-Speed Transportation Coordinated Development Evaluation in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Lijuan Zhang & Tatyana Ponomarenko, 2023. "Directions for Sustainable Development of China’s Coal Industry in the Post-Epidemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    6. Jiao Zhang & Qian Wang & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Mackin, Hunter C. & Jackson, Randall D. & Kucharik, Christopher J., 2025. "Adding pasture and grazing management to the Agro-IBIS agroecosystem simulation model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Hu Liao & Hu Li & Chen-Song Duan & Xin-Yuan Zhou & Qiu-Ping Luo & Xin-Li An & Yong-Guan Zhu & Jian-Qiang Su, 2022. "Response of soil viral communities to land use changes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Norton Barros Felix & Priscila Celebrini de Oliveira Campos & Igor Paz & Maria Esther Soares Marques, 2022. "Geoprocessing Applied to the Assessment of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in a Brazilian Medium-Sized City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Xiaoyang Liu & Weihao Shi & Sen Zhang, 2022. "Progress of Research on Urban Growth Boundary and Its Implications in Chinese Studies Based on Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Yiwen Shao & Yao Sun & Zhiru Zheng, 2023. "How Do Comprehensive Territorial Plans Frame Resilience? A Content Analysis of Plans by Major Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Tuan Nguyen Tran, 2024. "Comparing the process of converting land use purposes between socio-economic regions in Vietnam from 2007 to 2020," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 51-62.
    13. Bing-Bing Zhou & Jingyuan Liu & Xiaoke Wang, 2025. "Advancing Sustainability Through Land-Related Approaches: Insights from NRC (1999) and a Bold Call to Action," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Wei-Ling Hsu & Xijuan Shen & Haiying Xu & Chunmei Zhang & Hsin-Lung Liu & Yan-Chyuan Shiau, 2021. "Integrated Evaluations of Resource and Environment Carrying Capacity of the Huaihe River Ecological and Economic Belt in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Li, Xiaoliang & Wu, Kening & Yang, Qijun & Hao, Shiheng & Feng, Zhe & Ma, Jinliang, 2023. "Quantitative assessment of cultivated land use intensity in Heilongjiang Province, China, 2001–2015," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Zhu, Zichun & Fu, Congsheng & Wu, Huawu & Wu, Haohao & Zhang, Haixia & Cao, Yang & Xia, Ye, 2023. "What influences does grazing bring about to stream nutrient fluxes in alpine meadows?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    17. Zhang, Zuo & Tang, Wenwu, 2023. "Mixed landform with high-rise buildings: A spatial analysis integrating horizon-vertical dimension in natural-human urban systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    18. Barbier, Edward B., 2025. "Greening agriculture for rural development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Dinghua Ou & Qi Zhang & Yijie Wu & Jing Qin & Jianguo Xia & Ouping Deng & Xuesong Gao & Jinhu Bian & Shangqi Gong, 2021. "Construction of a Territorial Space Classification System Based on Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Land Use and Its Superior Territorial Space Functions and Their Dynamic Coupling: Case Study on Qiong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Xinyuan Liang & Jie He & Xiaobin Jin & Xiaolin Zhang & Jingping Liu & Yinkang Zhou, 2024. "A new framework for optimizing ecological conservation redline of China: A case from an environment‐development conflict area," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1616-1633, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07363-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.